[argyllcms] Re: A few questions + an idea for spyd2.c (this time even more useless than before!)

From: Martin Weberg <martin.weberg@xxxxxxxxx>
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:10:15 +0100

Thank you. The need for other patches then those used for profiling
when testing the profile has been issued before. However, adding those
extra patches for profile creation is a great tip.

Martin Weberg

> If anyone has missed the excellent Nikolay's testing workflow:
>
> http://www.freelists.org/post/argyllcms/A-few-questions-an-idea-for-spyd2c-this-time-even-more-useless-than-before,3
> http://www.freelists.org/post/argyllcms/A-few-questions-an-idea-for-spyd2c-this-time-even-more-useless-than-before,4

References:

[argyllcms] Colormunki create > was Wanted: Spyder 3 and ColorMunki Beta Testers
From: Lars Tore Gustavsen

[argyllcms] Re: Colormunki create > was Wanted: Spyder 3 and ColorMunki Beta Testers
From: Graeme Gill

[argyllcms] A few questions + an idea for spyd2.c (this time even more useless than before!)
From: howdy555

[argyllcms] Re: A few questions + an idea for spyd2.c (this time even more useless than before!)
From: Graeme Gill

[argyllcms] Re: A few questions + an idea for spyd2.c (this time even more useless than before!)
From: howdy555

[argyllcms] Re: A few questions + an idea for spyd2.c (this time even more useless than before!)
From: Graeme Gill

[argyllcms] Re: A few questions + an idea for spyd2.c (this time even more useless than before!)
From: howdy555

[argyllcms] Re: A few questions + an idea for spyd2.c (this time even more useless than before!)

Other related posts: