[argyllcms] Re: 1.1.0 RC - camera profiling
- From: Klaus Karcher <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:04:34 +0100
Iliah Borg wrote:
To my opinion, currently Argyll CMS offers better camera profiles than
any other non-spectral based solution I know of. My sincere
congratulations to Mr. Gill.
I like to join your congratulations. I use Argyll to profile large
format scanners. Unfortunately the Sensors of these scanners are far
away from fulfilling the Luther condition and their fluorescent light
sources don't really contribute to make the situation better. In order
to cover metamerism issues and problematic samples, I use up to ten
different targets (many of them are self made) and sometimes
supplementary sampling points measured in typical originals to create a
scanner profile. I appreciate the unrivaled flexibility Argyll offers.
And the quality I get (in particular with RC1/RC2) beats everything else
I've seen so far.
In my experience, accurate Argyll profiles combined with measures to
reduce scan-to-variability can even outperform spectrally-aided
workflows like Ergosoft's HP Artist solution for Nikon or Betterlight's
ColorSage.
Klaus Karcher
Other related posts:
