[argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- From: Burckhart Seifert <burckhart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:49:09 +0100
Am 04.12.2006 um 14:29 schrieb Graeme Gill:
Burckhart Seifert wrote:
The preview of 0.60 looks very misshaped in ProfileEditor, in VRML
it looks very different to the preview of the same file
calculated with 0.53 and I have some results out of tolerance in
some patches of the MediaWedge.
There's not much anyone can do, unless you are a bit more specific,
such as attaching the .ti3 file (or mail it to me if you don't wish
to make it public), so that we can take a look at it.
Hi Graeme, thanks for the reply. Here they are:
http://www.colortaxi.de/misc/argyll/
How are you using the profiles ?
Is it for proofing, or for pretty pictures ?
The profile is intended to proof the output of ISO Coated in the
ColorGATE RIP for the Epson Sylus Pro 4800..
What sort of source profile are you linking it with ?
What's the idea of forcing the saturation table to be
absolute colorimetric (something that's kind of irrelevant,
since you aren't supplying a source gamut, and absolute intent
is not something that makes a lot of sense in the context of
an ICC device profile - the table data is relative colorimetic
by definition, and absolute intent is chosen at linking time.
I'm not even sure what it does with such an option...)
Thanks for clearinng that. O.k. it doesn't matter if I do not link
anything. So I leave the option -T out to write a device profile, but
I get the same results.
cheers,
Graeme Gill.
Greetings
Burckhart Seifert
- References:
- [argyllcms] 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- From: Burckhart Seifert
- [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- » [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
Burckhart Seifert wrote:
The preview of 0.60 looks very misshaped in ProfileEditor, in VRML it looks very different to the preview of the same file calculated with 0.53 and I have some results out of tolerance in some patches of the MediaWedge.
There's not much anyone can do, unless you are a bit more specific, such as attaching the .ti3 file (or mail it to me if you don't wish to make it public), so that we can take a look at it.
How are you using the profiles ? Is it for proofing, or for pretty pictures ?
What sort of source profile are you linking it with ? What's the idea of forcing the saturation table to be absolute colorimetric (something that's kind of irrelevant, since you aren't supplying a source gamut, and absolute intent is not something that makes a lot of sense in the context of an ICC device profile - the table data is relative colorimetic by definition, and absolute intent is chosen at linking time. I'm not even sure what it does with such an option...)
cheers, Graeme Gill.
- [argyllcms] 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- From: Burckhart Seifert
- [argyllcms] Re: 0.60 CMYK profile misshaped
- From: Graeme Gill