[arachne] Re: illegal attachments?
- From: "L.D. Best" <l.d.best@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:06:35 -0500
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club! Sorry Sam, but you pushed a button ... Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
OK, but is this really necessary? Don't most people examine batch files to determine what they do before they run them? Also, don't most people do a virus scan and a spyware scan of ".exe" and ".com" files before they run them?
Yes No No
Are there really a lot of people out there who haven't even gotten the word about how it is smart to practice "safe hex"?
The majorityAnd the majority of people out there use an e-mail client which strives to open attachments on mssgs rec'd so as to present a pretty picture or play a song while you read or .... etc etc & soforth
Now I know for a fact that Linux servers (at least Red Hat) can be set to disallow SENDING of certain types of attachments. I know that because I have one of the few ISPs with a server which considers ZBM a valid extension. <G> But afaik MickySoft servers *cannot* be set to disallow sending certain types of files (or allow sending of only certain types of files) ... or the ISPs who run solely M$ have staff who don't know how to do it.
There are, however, a few plug-ins companies have learned that can protect their networks to one degree or another. So most often you'll get "illegal" or "virus infested" kickbacks from private rather than public servers.
Bottom line: The majority of people use 'doze; the majority of people don't know how a computer works; the majority of people don't know what a "bat" file is (nor that they're .cmd files in XP ); the majority of people have their e-mail readers (even those who don't use OE) set to open attachments automagically; the majority of people bitch about Big Brother taking away their freedoms while also bitching about Big Brother not protecting them well enough.
And "most" people trust M$ security and a *monthly* malware tool to keep their computers/pda's healthy.
As a consequence, most companies and many ISPs find they must be responsible for keeping the users' diapers changed.
l.d.Arachne at FreeLists -- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --
- Follow-Ups:
- [arachne] Re: illegal attachments?
- From: Rob
- [arachne] Re: illegal attachments?
- References:
- [arachne] Re: illegal attachments?
- From: Glenn Gilbreath Jr .
- [arachne] Re: illegal attachments?
- From: Samuel W. Heywood
- [arachne] Re: illegal attachments?
Other related posts:
- » [arachne] illegal attachments? - Samuel W. Heywood
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Glenn Gilbreath Jr .
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Samuel W. Heywood
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Sam Ewalt
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Samuel W. Heywood
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Glenn Gilbreath Jr .
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Sam Ewalt
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - L.D. Best
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Greg Mayman
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Rob
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Sam Ewalt
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] illegal attachments? - Brian C. Murphy
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Brian C. Murphy
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Rob
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - L.D. Best
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Sam Ewalt
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Greg Mayman
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Greg Mayman
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Sam Ewalt
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Rob
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Udo Kuhnt
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Sam Ewalt
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Jason
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Sam Ewalt
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Greg Mayman
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Greg Mayman
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Eric S. Emerson
- » [arachne] Re: illegal attachments? - Greg Mayman