[arachne] Re: arachne Digest V2 #208

Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:22:40 -0800, Ray Andrews wrote:

> Good thinking as always, but some caution is needed with this kind of
> thing since if total freedom with key assignments were allowed, one
> could easily screw things up totally.  And, when Arachne has
> completely relegated IE to the dustbin of history, her millions of
> users will find it easier to communicate with each other if they
> have some common understanding of what the keys do.  But conceptually,
> there'd be no need for a separate .exe, just more options in arachne.cfg.
> But there's no doubt we can and should move a long way toward more
> customizations.

Agreed, especially that bit about screwing things up totally.

But for an example of user-programmability, I suggest you take a look at
QEDIT. There is an example of how to achieve what appears to be the
ultimate in that respect.

> Hey, where are those bridge playing retired DOS wizards you promised me? ;-)

Still playing bridge? <GGGG>


   ,-./\      from Greg Mayman, in Adelaide, South Australia
  /     \     "Queen City of The South"    34:55 S  138:36 E
  \_,-*_/
       v     homepage http://users.tpg.com.au/gmone/index.htm


Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --

Other related posts: