[arachne] Re: XE
- From: Jason Dodd <jasorn@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:39:23 -0500
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
Glenn McCorkle wrote:
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:19:14 -0500, Jason Dodd wrote:
I might be the only here who uses xe but just
in case I'm not, a while back I asked if
someone would compile xe in dos. Someone
replied the binary works. My concern was that
the dos version is very old. I just installed
freedos and the newest gcc version of xe
works with the default freedos installation
with no problems.
Why did you want a new version for DOS ?
Is there some feature in the new version for Linux
which the older DOS version lacks ?
Actually, there are quite a few improvements that make the newer
versions closer to the mainframe editor, it seems faster, et al. These
changes are in the windows versions, too. As far as I can tell the
features of the same version number are the same for all the platforms
unless required to be different due to the fact it's on a different
platform. The newest DOS version is 1.13b
<http://www.geocities.jp/sakachin2/XED113B.LZH> whereas the newest GCC
version is 1.22 <http://www.geocities.jp/sakachin2/XEGCC122.ZIP>. Since
the DOS version was lagging behind the others I asked the author
Sarachin(I think that's his name), if he was going to update it. He
said probably not because of resource limitations in DOS machines. I
thought that meant I'd be stuck using 1.13 or have to compile the gcc
version. But the gcc version is compiled and happens to work in
freedos. The funny thing(to me anyway), is the gcc version has a folder
labeled *dos* inside it that contains what appear to be dos versions of
the programs but they don't work. So I'm not sure really what's the
difference between the dos version and the gcc version.
Doesn't really matter to me since the gcc version 1.22 works fine in
freedos and that's what I was looking for. But I think I'll ask him
what the difference is anyway.
What are the changes? I think there were some little things like
changes in the help docs, fixes to the ini file, somegui fixes(not
applicable here), etc. But the things that I liked the most are the
change to caps lock so that it's more like the mainframe caps lock and
the removal of the 999 limit on the delete command. Nothing super big
but since I've got 12+ years behind me of using both of those they seem
to click in automagically when I'm in an spf editor and it's nice to
have it work the way I'm used to.
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --
- References:
- [arachne] Re: XE
- From: Glenn McCorkle
Other related posts:
- » [arachne] XE
- » [arachne] Re: XE
- » [arachne] Re: XE
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:19:14 -0500, Jason Dodd wrote:
I might be the only here who uses xe but just
in case I'm not, a while back I asked if
someone would compile xe in dos. Someone
replied the binary works. My concern was that
the dos version is very old. I just installed
freedos and the newest gcc version of xe
works with the default freedos installation
with no problems.
Why did you want a new version for DOS ?
Is there some feature in the new version for Linux
which the older DOS version lacks ?
- [arachne] Re: XE
- From: Glenn McCorkle