[arachne] Re: XE
- From: "Glenn McCorkle" <glennmcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, arachne4dos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:02:56 -0500
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:19:14 -0500, Jason Dodd wrote:
> I might be the only here who uses xe but just
> in case I'm not, a while back I asked if
> someone would compile xe in dos. Someone
> replied the binary works. My concern was that
> the dos version is very old. I just installed
> freedos and the newest gcc version of xe
> works with the default freedos installation
> with no problems.
Why did you want a new version for DOS ?
Is there some feature in the new version for Linux
which the older DOS version lacks ?
--
Glenn
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.table.html
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --
- Follow-Ups:
- [arachne] Re: XE
- From: Jason Dodd
- [arachne] ARA-PDF.APM under FreeDOS 1.0 and Arachne 1.90J1
- From: John Hupp
Other related posts:
- » [arachne] XE
- » [arachne] Re: XE
- » [arachne] Re: XE
- [arachne] Re: XE
- From: Jason Dodd
- [arachne] ARA-PDF.APM under FreeDOS 1.0 and Arachne 1.90J1
- From: John Hupp