[arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- From: Jason Dodd <jasorn@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 18:00:21 -0600
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
Steve wrote:
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Udo Kuhnt wrote:
Well, it is easy to say that Arachne is better than Netscape or Internet
Explorer if your Windows is just a few key presses away.
I would suggest that all the people on this list who would like to tell
me how user-friendly Arachne is and how bad Windows is to just try to do
without their Windows for a month, or perhaps only a week;
Easy. I've never owned Windows; most likely never will.
Even so, I can do everything I want to, and more... and do it easier
than with Windows.
You should take your own advice, only extend it. Do without Windows
for a year, i.e., use a *nix instead. Once your year is up, you'll
wonder how you ever managed to tolerate Windows in the first place.
I agree; switched from windows 2 years ago and am soooo glad I made the
change. I use linux, dos, and my commodore. I do use windows at work
but not at home. At home I just log in to windows once a week to update
it and the antivirus but I don't do any computing on it anymore.
then they would probably realise how much Arachne is lacking.
Now that I have said what I think, go on and flame me for criticising
Arachne if you like. ;-)
However, I agree too that it in it's present state, Arachne isn't as
good as Opera, IE, Firefox, Mozilla, Netscape, or a pretty long list of
other browsers. Nothing to do with OS. Comparing the user friendliness
of a program to an OS isn't quite a valid comparison.
The biggest objection I have with Arachne is that it only goes up to
version 1.66 on the Linux branch.
So, the only way I get to use Arachne is to 'ssh -Y' to my old RH
6.2 box (which runs 24/7 as a news & database server) and fire it up
over there, displaying the GGI on the FreeBSD box.
Run-there, display-here arrangement makes mouse movements awfully slow
though. I've taken to using 'links -g' a lot more.
I second this. In fact, I tried to 'update' it so it would compile on
linux but didn't get too far. I might give it another go here shortly.
But it does seem disingenuos to keep using this line: -- Arachne, The
Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
--
Jason Dodd
jasorn@xxxxxxxxx
618-917-4051
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [arachne] User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Udo Kuhnt wrote:
Well, it is easy to say that Arachne is better than Netscape or Internet Explorer if your Windows is just a few key presses away. I would suggest that all the people on this list who would like to tell me how user-friendly Arachne is and how bad Windows is to just try to do without their Windows for a month, or perhaps only a week;
Easy. I've never owned Windows; most likely never will.
Even so, I can do everything I want to, and more... and do it easier than with Windows.
You should take your own advice, only extend it. Do without Windows for a year, i.e., use a *nix instead. Once your year is up, you'll wonder how you ever managed to tolerate Windows in the first place.
then they would probably realise how much Arachne is lacking. Now that I have said what I think, go on and flame me for criticising Arachne if you like. ;-)
The biggest objection I have with Arachne is that it only goes up to version 1.66 on the Linux branch.
So, the only way I get to use Arachne is to 'ssh -Y' to my old RH 6.2 box (which runs 24/7 as a news & database server) and fire it up over there, displaying the GGI on the FreeBSD box.
Run-there, display-here arrangement makes mouse movements awfully slow
though. I've taken to using 'links -g' a lot more.
Arachne at FreeLists -- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
-- Jason Dodd
Arachne at FreeLists -- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --