[arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne

Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!

Hi Folks,

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:59:29 -0700 (MST)
Steve <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
> 
> 
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Ron Clarke wrote:
> 
> >   Possibly because it has a very similar "feel" to Arachne, although it 
> > is not as flexible, and certainly not as customisable, as Arachne.
> 
>    I don't know about that.  Do a 
> $ links -h
> and see 341 lines of options (at least on Links 2.1pre20)

   I am using Links 2.1pre14, to go with BasicLinux 2.1 (Slackware 7.1 based).
And not so many options, but that isn't what I mean by flexible.  For Arachne, 
I can edit the various screens and add functionality where I want it.  Now 
that's flexible !    :)

> 
> > When current Arachne is fully ported to Linux, I think it will make 
> > quite an impression.
> 
>    I've been getting the impression that such a port will be highly unlikely.

    Not unlikely, but probably not soon.   :(

Regards,
         Ron

-- 
Ron Clarke 
AUSREG Consultancy      http://www.ausreg.com
Tadpole Tunes           http://tadpole.mytunebook.de/
This mail sent to you from sylpheed running on penguin-power
                  Arachne at FreeLists                  
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --

Other related posts: