[arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- From: Steve <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:00:49 -0700 (MST)
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Udo Kuhnt wrote:
If you would have read my next post, you would know my answer. I have
used Linux long enough to realise that it is *not* the glorious
next-generation OS that some people proclaim it.
Since you didn't address the point, I can only assume then that you
never took the time to really learn the difference between Unices and
Linux distributions, or even the differences between a few out of the
plethora of Linux distributions.
Whatever, I'm no evangelist. If you're happy within the constraints of
Windows/DOS, happy trails.
That said, (now addressing everyone else) I've developed a
fondness/respect for FreeBSD. It has the organization and singularity of
focus that the hodgepodge Linux distributions lack, yet the BSD licence is
even less restrictive than the GPL. While there are scores and scores of
Linux distributions, there are about 4 FreeBSD distros. (I've just
finished downloading PC-BSD to put on my wife's new computer, which
shipped with XP preinstalled. PTUUUII! We'll fix that in a right hurry.)
old-fashioned and awkward as any kind of Unix I have encountered so far.
I wouldn't put all the unecessary eye-candy on my machine, but check out
what I'm putting on my wife's: http://www.pcbsd.com/index.php?p=pcbsd
I'd hardly call it old-fashioned or awkward. Pointy-clicky for her, CLI
for me when I need to "administer" it. She's used Xandros, Ubuntu, and
Debian w/Gnome, and played with the Knoppix liveCD a bit. I think Xandros
was the one she liked most, so PCBSD should fit right into her comfort
zone.
IMO, it is an OS of the past, not of the future, and while I will
probably continue to use it once in a while for some time to use
software that only exists on Unix, I will stop using it once this
software has been ported to DOS.
Well there you go. You obviously don't want to use your computer for
the same kinds of things I use mine for. To each his own.
I do wish that I could do secure transactions with Arachne,
and if it could do Javascript then life would be easier.
I was going to mention the first time around that links does https, and
limited JavaScript. One of the things I love most about this browser is
that it pops up in less than two seconds on my CyrixIII-750. IMO, it's
the ultimate in combining minimalism and functionality. (all screenshots
use "links -g", the graphical option. In plain mode, links looks pretty
much like lynx)
Links does paypal (JS + https):
http://wizard.dyndns.org/links-https-popup-paypal.png
links does dreamhost (https + forms):
http://wizard.dyndns.org/links-https-dreamhost.png
links does links (hit "g" to pop up "Go to URL" dialog):
http://wizard.dyndns.org/links-links-g.png
links does arachne II (just because):
http://wizard.dyndns.org/links-arachneII.png
- Steve
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
- References:
- [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- From: Udo Kuhnt
Other related posts:
- » [arachne] User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Udo Kuhnt wrote:
If you would have read my next post, you would know my answer. I have used Linux long enough to realise that it is *not* the glorious next-generation OS that some people proclaim it.
IMO, it is an OS of the past, not of the future, and while I will probably continue to use it once in a while for some time to use software that only exists on Unix, I will stop using it once this software has been ported to DOS.
I do wish that I could do secure transactions with Arachne, and if it could do Javascript then life would be easier.
- [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- From: Udo Kuhnt