[arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- From: Ron Clarke <ariadne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 08:20:59 +1100
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
Hi Folks,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:10:22 -0700 (MST)
Steve <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Udo Kuhnt wrote:
>
> > I would suggest that all the people on this list who would like to tell
> > me how user-friendly Arachne is and how bad Windows is to just try to do
> > without their Windows for a month, or perhaps only a week;
>
> Easy. I've never owned Windows; most likely never will.
I don't use Windows(3.1) for internet or email, either. And I haven't for
may years.
And I will not even consider installing Windows9x or later.
> You should take your own advice, only extend it. Do without Windows for
> a year, i.e., use a *nix instead. Once your year is up, you'll wonder how
> you ever managed to tolerate Windows in the first place.
I have been using Linux for several years now, but I still maintain an
up-to-date Arachne - which I use, but infrequently.
> The biggest objection I have with Arachne is that it only goes up to
> version 1.66 on the Linux branch.
I have said much the same in previous posts.
> So, the only way I get to use Arachne is to 'ssh -Y' to my old RH 6.2
> box (which runs 24/7 as a news & database server) and fire it up over
> there, displaying the GGI on the FreeBSD box.
I use Slackware 7.1 to run Arachne under Linux. But too few of her
functions have been ported yet to make her a viable browser.
> Run-there, display-here arrangement makes mouse movements awfully slow
> though. I've taken to using 'links -g' a lot more.
My favourite browser in Linux ! :)
Possibly because it has a very similar "feel" to Arachne, although it is not
as flexible, and certainly not as customisable, as Arachne. When current
Arachne is fully ported to Linux, I think it will make quite an impression.
Regards,
Ron
--
Ron Clarke
AUSREG Consultancy http://www.ausreg.com
Tadpole Tunes http://tadpole.mytunebook.de/
This mail sent to you from sylpheed running on penguin-power
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
- Follow-Ups:
- [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- From: Steve
- [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- From: Florian Xaver
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [arachne] User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- » [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- From: Steve
- [arachne] Re: User-friendliness or lack thereof in Arachne
- From: Florian Xaver