[arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- From: "Bastiaan T.Edelman" <bastiaan.pa3ffz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:00:02 +0100
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
Message resent 16th August 2005
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:52:20 -0600, Scott Warnick wrote:
<snip>
> If I'm not the only person in the world using FAT32 drives and a cable
> modem connection, the Pocket Arachne team has a couple of
> issues to address, i.e. FAT32 drives and potentional RAM cram. The
> solution isn't obvious, though. When I was experimenting I found
> out that OpenDOS has by far the smallest kernel/command.com combination.
> I'm sure that's why you chose it. (Kernel size matters a whole lot when
> you are working with a 1.44 MB floppy and your ramdisk image takes up
> 1.2 MB.) How would you feel about a two-diskette distribution of PA185 for
> users who have FAT32 drives or who just want to run under a different
> OS? I can create it and upload it if you will point me to a good
> ramdisk image creation tool.
How about creating a CD instead of running 2 floppies?
Booting (reading) a floppy is a slow proces and reading 2 floppies is
very slow. Besides: modern computers don't even have a drive for a flop.
At least 2 items should be on that self booting CD:
#1 DOS operating system (FreeDOS?)
#2 Arachne
#3 Many other DOS programs are possible
We have a problem though... Pocket Arachne writes to the disk, eg the
configuration files. That is not possible on a CD.
Regards, Bastiaan
** This mail was written by a user of the Arachne Browser **
** Version 1.85 **
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
- Follow-Ups:
- [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- From: Scott Warnick
Other related posts:
- » [arachne] Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- From: Scott Warnick