[arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- From: "Udo Kuhnt" <048321887-0001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:52:25 +0000
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
Hi,
sorry for intruding and for shamelessly advertising my own project, but
what about using the Enhanced DR-DOS kernel instead? It is based on
OpenDOS, and it features both FAT32 support and more free base RAM,
provided that there is enough upper or high mem. It also works well with
Arachne, as I can tell from first-hand experience. :-)
Regards,
Udo
> If I'm not the only person in the world using FAT32 drives and a
> cable modem connection, the Pocket Arachne team has a couple of
> issues to address, i.e. FAT32 drives and potentional RAM cram. The
> solution isn't obvious, though. When I was experimenting I found
> out that OpenDOS has by far the smallest kernel/command.com
> combination. I'm sure that's why you chose it. (Kernel size matters a
> whole lot when you are working with a 1.44 MB floppy and your ramdisk
> image takes up 1.2 MB.)
-- The DR-DOS/OpenDOS Enhancement Project - http://www.drdosprojects.de
-- This mail was written by a user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
- Follow-Ups:
- [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- From: Scott Warnick
Other related posts:
- » [arachne] Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- » [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- [arachne] Re: Pocket Arachne 1.85 testing
- From: Scott Warnick