[arachne] Re: LSPPP versions
- From: "Sam Ewalt" <ewalt@xxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 13:41:58 -0500
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Thu, 20 May 2004 12:35:11 +1000, da Silva, Joe wrote:
> The reason you had changed to LSPPP was for its automatic
> DNS configuration feature, which is now less important as you
> now only use one ISP. The other benefit of LSPPP over EPPPD
> is that it uses less memory, which may or may not be important
> in your case.
Joe,
Does the latest version of LSPPP use more or less memory than
version O.75?
I've been using the older version since it became available to
Arachne users several years ago and it has always worked flawlessly
with my ISP. Is there any reason to update?
Sam Ewalt
Croswell, Michigan, USA
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
Other related posts: