Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club! >> What that quote means is that the >> critical files which the user has >> to setup with his preferences and >> data are being saved...but...they >> are not being used. > That is as it should be, of course. ... > So it looks like I must go to a bare-bones 1.90 if I want to upgrade, > then work up slowly from there. What is all this talk about? I said that I have *always* installed new Arachne versions over the old version, and I did not have to re-enter the relevant data; Arachne simply used the existing config files. I think some of the people who are participating in this discussion simply do not know what they are talking about since they never tried it "the other way". This kind of talk could easily make Arachne appear as being overly complicated to setup and maintain, so please think before you talk, lest you scare off people who are interested in it. If you mention that configuration files are being overwritten, then please also say which files you refer to. Regards, Udo -- The DR-DOS/OpenDOS Enhancement Project - http://www.drdosprojects.de -- This mail was written by a user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/ Arachne at FreeLists -- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --