[arachne] Re: Houston, we have a problem....
- From: "Eric S. Emerson" <wildrice5@xxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:49:46 -0400
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
Hi Glennmcc,
Did test downloads of files with core-1,
core-2, and core0607. See below....
core-1 load times: linux....gif = 1.01
. slck10....jpg = 1.22
core-2 load times: linux....gif = 1.02
. slck10....jpg = 1.22
core0607 load times: linux....gif = 1.01
. slck10....jpg = 1.23
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:05:14 -0500 "Glenn McCorkle" <glennmcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
> Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I need confirmation of a problem I've found.
>
> Please do some download speed tests of these 2 files...
>
> http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/images/linux_kde_netscape.gif
> http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/images/slck10_1.jpg
>
> Do the tests several times using both versions of core.exe
> from this ZIP file.
>
> http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/my-stuff/core-1-2.zip
>
> _________________________________________________________________
>
> So that these tests will be lagitamate.
> I will not say which of them has the problem and which not
> nor will I say what was done differently between the 2 compiles
> until after we get the results of more testing.
>
> --
> Glenn
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Web Browser/Suite for DOS and Linux --
Other related posts: