[arachne] Re: Bull***t (was Re: Mouse?)
- From: "Eric S. Emerson" <wildrice5@xxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:32:13 -0500
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
Udo,
I have no idea why you want to be
so nasty and use vulgar language and
bad mouth me but I can assure you it
is inappropriate on this list. I have a
right to my opinions as long as I don't
force them on others,so , I would
appreciate it if you would just back off.
At one time, years ago, when I started
using Arachne, the mouse driver did
use memory that I needed to run
Arachne. Please don't call me a liar!
And it your going to continue this
tyraid you know where you can shove
your mouse.
Eric
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:10:43 +0000 "Udo Kuhnt"
<048321887-0001@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
>
> > that I don't load a mouse driver. It was in
> > response to Udo's post stating that I use a mouse
> > more than I admit to. I don't need a mouse
> > for Arachne and that is an old 486 computer
> > with very limited resouces so I don't load a
> > mouse driver to conserve memory and because
>
> Eric,
>
> I really do not know what all your talk about limited resources is
> about. My mouse driver only needs 3.5 KB of memory, whereas my first
> 486
> PC already had 4 MB of main memory.
>
> I think limited resources is probably no argument against loading a
> mouse driver, and given the fact the many programs will not even run
> when there is no mouse driver present, there is certainly no reason
> for
> *not* loading the mouse driver even if one does not plan to actually
> use
> the mouse.
>
> I think there are already enough bad jokes about DOS users only using
> DOS because they cannot afford a machine capable of running
> WindowsNT,
> Linux or whatever. We certainly do not need anybody to feed the
> rumours
> by stating that he does not load the mouse driver on his DOS machine
> because he rather needs the few kilobytes to run applications.
>
> I think the last machine I have seen where loading the mouse driver
> had
> any effect on the free base memory was an XT with a 4.77 MHz 8088
> processor, so please tell the world that you hate using the mouse so
> much that you rather see those few kilobytes wasted than occupied by
> a
> mouse driver if you like but keep this memory conservation bullshit
> to
> yourself.
>
> Udo
>
> -- The DR-DOS/OpenDOS Enhancement Project -
> http://www.drdosprojects.de
>
> -- This mail was written by a user of The Arachne Browser -
> http://arachne.cz/
> Arachne at FreeLists
> -- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --
>
>
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --
- Follow-Ups:
- [arachne] Ahem ... Re: Bull***t (was Re: Mouse?)
- From: L.D. Best
Other related posts:
- » [arachne] Re: Bull***t (was Re: Mouse?)
- » [arachne] Re: Bull***t! (was Re: Mouse?)
- [arachne] Ahem ... Re: Bull***t (was Re: Mouse?)
- From: L.D. Best