Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
On Thu, 29 May 2008 18:44:54 +0000, Udo Kuhnt wrote:
> I think somebody has just suggested thet we should agree to disagree.
> Maybe we should simply agree to disagree with you on that matter. ;-)
Sure, I never get steamed up over this kind of thing, each one is
entitled to his own view. However, since I've rewritten the whole
of core.exe, I think I know what I'm talking about. I'd say the fact that
my core gives over 100K more free memory and is ca. 40% faster is proof
enough that the old core is rather less than optimized.
> Perhaps that is the wrong approach, perhaps it should rather the code
> that is *not* shared by all ports be kept in a separate library.
I know what you mean, but it's no argument. Once the components of the
.lib are disassembled and sorted out, the parts can be grouped and
stored a few different ways.
Regards,
Ray Andrews
.
-- Arachne;A3;1d
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --