[arachne] Re: Arachne for Linux...

Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!

Ray,

> Sure, I agree, it's just that I have gotten a bit discouraged by the
> fact that I'm working by myself. All the work I've done on the code isn't
> going to help the Linux version if I can't get anyone to use it.
> A bit of support would go a long way. The biggest problem we face is the
> fact that Glenn and some of the others are still trying to polish a
> turd so to speak by continuing to believe that the old sources can be
> tweeked into shape, whereas the fact is that they are fundamentaly
> flawed at the deepest level.

I think somebody has just suggested thet we should agree to disagree.
Maybe we should simply agree to disagree with you on that matter. ;-)

> I've pretty much got core.exe whipped into shape, so I've started to
> intigrate the video library directly into the core so that it becomes
> easy to see where the changes need to be made to port it to Linux.
> As it is, the Linux port doesn't use the XLOPIF library which is too
> bad, since the library contains low level stuff that is essential without
> another layer of patches and fixes to compensate for it's absence.
> Xchaos himself was smart enough to give up on that approach.
> In the last week I've cut over 300K of code from the .lib -- either
> irrelevant or integrated directly into core and optimized.

Perhaps that is the wrong approach, perhaps it should rather the code
that is *not* shared by all ports be kept in a separate library.

> Alas, I've lead the horse to water but it refuses to drink.

Perhaps that is because you have hitched up the carriage before the
horse. ;-)

Udo

-- The DR-DOS/OpenDOS Enhancement Project - http://www.drdosprojects.de

-- This mail was written by a user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
                  Arachne at FreeLists                  
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --

Other related posts: