[arachne] Re: 32 bit dos info wanted
- From: Jason and Ornumar Dodd <jasorn@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:05:26 -0500
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
Udo Kuhnt wrote:
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
Hello Brian,
Thanks to Udo for his comments in response to my enquiry about a viable
32 bit DOS that would run both old and new DOS software without
complaint, and would address more than 8 mb of hard drive (not RAM, as I
erroneously said via a slip of the finger and brain).
Udo said that FreeDos 1.0 can address more than 8 mb of hard drive, but
the freedos people said it could not address more than 8 mb of hard
drive.
I do not know why the FreeDOS people say so; AFAIK FreeDOS has been
able to address more than 8 GB of hard disk space for several years now.
I installed freedos 1.0 on this laptop. It's got a 20gb hd. dir shows
"18,643 Mega bytes free"
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --
- References:
- [arachne] Re: 32 bit dos info wanted
- From: Udo Kuhnt
Other related posts:
- » [arachne] 32 bit dos info wanted
- » [arachne] Re: 32 bit dos info wanted
- » [arachne] Re: 32 bit dos info wanted
- » [arachne] Re: 32 bit dos info wanted
- » [arachne] Re: 32 bit dos info wanted
- » [arachne] Re: 32 bit dos info wanted
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club! Hello Brian,
Thanks to Udo for his comments in response to my enquiry about a viable 32 bit DOS that would run both old and new DOS software without complaint, and would address more than 8 mb of hard drive (not RAM, as I erroneously said via a slip of the finger and brain).
Udo said that FreeDos 1.0 can address more than 8 mb of hard drive, but the freedos people said it could not address more than 8 mb of hard drive.
I do not know why the FreeDOS people say so; AFAIK FreeDOS has been able to address more than 8 GB of hard disk space for several years now.
- [arachne] Re: 32 bit dos info wanted
- From: Udo Kuhnt