[antispam-f] Re: ARMv7 compatibility?
- From: Frank de Bruijn <antispam@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:58:41 +0200
In article <e640557b52.davehigton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Dave Higton <davehigton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ultimately, I take it that a ROM date means that any ROM of
> that date /or/ /later/ will be OK, so I'm not going to change
> the ROM date.
OK.
> > I must admit I'm a bit miffed to find this nearly nine year old
> > version mentioned in a list I have never even looked at before (I
> > knew it existed but that was it). What makes someone refer to a
> > totally outdated version of software that is actively maintained?
> > Weird.
> Now that AntiSpam's maintainer is aware of the wiki, perhaps he
> will keep AntiSpam's entry up to date :-)
No problem with that.
I was aware of the wiki, just not that someone had listed an old version
of AntiSpam on it. I'm still not clear why that fact keeps irritating
me...
> I have no idea who added AntiSpam to the list. I stuck with an
> old version for years - but even that was version 1.23.
Indeed. I knew a later version than 1.18 existed in the original branch.
That's how I knew it couldn't have been you. :-)
Regards,
Frank
Other related posts:
