[adsi] Re: them, the sequal
- From: "Ken Schmahl, P.E." <kschmahl@xxxxxxxx>
- To: adsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:58:59 -0800
No, you missunderstand me. I don't worry about cluttering up YOUR mailbox,
just the others. :-)
ks
On Nov 12, 2007 8:22 AM, Matthew Zilmer <mzilmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey! When did you **ever** worry about cluttering up an Inbox? What's
> happening to you Ken?
>
> J
>
>
>
> Matt Zilmer
>
> Product Systems Engineering
>
> Magellan Navigation, Inc.
>
> US+909-394-6052
>
> Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
>
>
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
> use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact
> the sender and delete all copies.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* kschmahl@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:kschmahl@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ken
> Schmahl, P.E.
> *Sent:* Friday, November 09, 2007 4:43 PM
> *To:* Jeff Stai; Andre Thomas; Clyde. org; Matthew Zilmer; Milton
> Scritsmier
> *Subject:* Re: them, the sequal
>
>
>
> ADES was taken by some Linux dude. I have no idea why, except that its in
> a foreign language. So I'm setting up ADSI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> ks
>
>
>
> On 11/8/07, *Ken Schmahl, P.E.* <kschmahl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think I'm gonna make another alias with a smaller group size. These are
> folks I've known long enough that I can ramble without worrying about
> cluttering their inbox. Since I rarely ramble it shouldn't be any more of a
> burden on your inbox.
>
>
>
> "Jeff Stai" <jds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andre Thomas" < avthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Clyde. org" < Clyde.R.Visser@xxxxxxxx>, "Matthew Zilmer" <
> mzilmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Milton Scritsmier"
> <Milton_Scritsmier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
>
>
> I wonder if ADES@xxxxxxxxxxxxx is taken?
>
> ks
>
>
>
Other related posts:
- » [adsi] Re: them, the sequal
