[accessibleimage] Re: what about?
- From: "Will Pearson" <will-pearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <accessibleimage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:41:10 -0000
Hi Lisa et al,
I think it would be possible to add supplementary information to existing
maps. The interesting thing I noticed from the articles was that people
were identifying navigation points based on their features. This differs
from the typical cartographic practice of just communicating objects, which
can be thought of as a collection of features. It may be that the articles
just picked up on the aspect of features and that people do use objects as
navigational points; however, I would think it likely that people do use
individual features to differentiate between two objects of the same type.
It would be interesting to do some experimentation around what features and
objects people actually use to navigate environments. I think this is
definately an area where blind people are at a disadvantage. The visual
system has the potential for greater variability than other sensory systems
and the variability makes for easier differentiation between similar
objects. For example, there may be two shops producing similar auditory,
olfactory, haptic, and kinesthetic stimuli. In these situations the
features of the two shops are that similar that an attempt to identify the
type of the shop will lead to ambiguous results. There are other factors
that can held to disambiguate object identities, such as keeping track of
location, but these are reliant on memory and local knowledge, neither of
which may be available.
As for a system, my little haptic drawing tool could be used to explore
monochrome maps and it is certainly technically feasible to add additional
features to aid a person with map exploration; however, to get the best
system I think we need to know a few factors. Firstly, whether blind people
use the same objects and features to navigate as sighted people. We also
need to take into account sensory and memory limitations when choosing an
output medium given that a lot of information contained in maps is encoded
in spatial relationships.
Will
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lisa Yayla" <fnugg@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <accessibleimage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 12:59 PM
Subject: [accessibleimage] what about?
Hi,
What about then taking these two mails and combining them in a way?
I
mean from Google's map directions one gets a type of line map and from
Rachel Magario map information. Couldn't visually impaired persons make
their own maps with the aid of a GPS and share them over the net? I might
be talking through my hat since I don't have a GPS only covet one but from
what I have read is that one can plot in ones own point of interest (POI)
and then create a trace file and the create a map from this. Either swell
out or emboss with a Tiger. At the points of interest one could add the
extra information, sound, smell etc.
One could end up with two types of maps, a line (list) map like the Google
direction information except it would have the added information and a
geographical map from the GPS trace file.
Or what about a site where local way finding information is on line sent
in from visually impaired? One doesn't need a GPS for this, just perhaps a
note taker to help remember what one notices.
Any thoughts?
Best,
Lisa
- References:
- [accessibleimage] what about?
- From: Lisa Yayla
Other related posts:
- » [accessibleimage] what about?
- » [accessibleimage] Re: what about?
- » [accessibleimage] Re: what about?
- » [accessibleimage] Re: what about?
- » [accessibleimage] Re: what about?
Hi, What about then taking these two mails and combining them in a way?
Any thoughts? Best, Lisa
- [accessibleimage] what about?
- From: Lisa Yayla