[accessibleimage] Simulations of Ailing Artists’ Eyes Yield New Insights on Style
- From: Lisa Yayla <fnugg@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: accessibleimage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:39:45 +0100
excerpt NY Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/science/04impr.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Simulations of Ailing Artists’ Eyes Yield New Insights on Style
For Claude Monet, 1912-22 was a watershed decade. He was perhaps the
most successful artist of his time, and his genius had already assured
him a place in history.
Artistic Limitations But as he aged, his painting noticeably lost
subtlety. Brush strokes became bolder, and colors strikingly blue,
orange or brown. His images lost detail and flowed into one another. His
days as an avant-garde rebel had long passed, but some critics would
later wonder whether the Impressionist was suddenly trying to become an
abstract expressionist.
What has long been known about Monet’s later years is that he suffered
from cataracts and that his eyesight worsened so much that he painted
from memory. He acknowledged to an interviewer that he was “trusting
solely to the labels on the tubes of paint and to the force of habit.”
Now, thanks to modern digital techniques, scientists and critics can
have a better idea how cataracts changed what Monet saw. This year, an
ophthalmologist at Stanford, Michael F. Marmor, described in The
Archives of Ophthalmology creating computer simulations of Monet’s world
as his lenses yellowed, blurring vision and turning patterns of color
and light into muddy, unfocused, yellow-green inkblots.
Although it is impossible to know how Monet wanted his canvases to look,
Dr. Marmor’s research suggests that understanding physical infirmity can
help assess his work. Whatever Monet intended, his eyes provided little
help. “He couldn’t judge what he was seeing or see what he was
painting,” Dr. Marmor said. “It is a mystery how he worked.”
Monet was not alone. France in the late 19th and early 20th centuries
embraced an astonishing number of important artists who battled serious
physical shortcomings — sometimes for decades. Edgar Degas, known for
his paintings of nudes and ballet dancers, suffered retinal disease,
probably macular degeneration, for nearly half his life. When he died in
1917, his colleague Pierre Auguste Renoir said, “It is fortunate for him
... any conceivable death is better than living the way he was.”
Renoir suffered painful rheumatoid arthritis for more than 30 years,
continuing to paint as assistants inserted brushes between his gnarled
fingers.
Mary Cassatt, like Monet, had cataracts. Camille Pissarro had a
malfunctioning tear duct. Seizures and other nervous disorders tortured
and ultimately destroyed Vincent van Gogh.
Over the years, Dr. Marmor and other scientists have studied artists for
insights into physical condition’s influences on style and perception.
“It made it difficult for them to judge if their art was accomplishing
what they intended,” Dr. Marmor said.
Other related posts:
- » [accessibleimage] Simulations of Ailing Artists’ Eyes Yield New Insights on Style