[accessibleimage] Re: Question about art movement
- From: Lisa Yayla <fnugg@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: accessibleimage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:16:24 +0200
Great answer Jennifer.
The Photoshop example helped me understand it.
Thanks,
Lisa
Jennifer Justice wrote:
It would seem to me that artistic movments
(particularly Western artistic movements) tend to
evolve out of a set of shared aesthetic, theoretical,
or ideological principles rather than a technological
advance or the novel application of technology for
making art. If there is a movement comprised of blind
artists/ disabled artists (and I believe there is-
check out the Bodies of Work Festival that took place
in Chicago in Aprl for a good example), then that
movement is motivated by sociological/ politcal
factors more than by technological innovations, Even
if a bunch of people started making Braille embosser
art and their was a nationwide craze for it, it would
probably fall under the category of a new artistic
medium as opposed to a movement. Another way of
explaining it would be that PhotoShop users do not
comprise an artistic movement but what some digital
artists do with it could be thought of in that way.
Great question Lisa!
Jennifer
--- Lisa Yayla <fnugg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Was wondering about something.
Elizabeth Goldring uses the ophthalmoscope as a
medium for artist
expression. I was having a discussion a bit back
with an artist about
using an embosser to create art. Isn't this a new
trend? Using tools
that are specifically meant for the visually
impaired to create visual
and tactile art? Of course I know there are many
visually impaired
artist but aren't these tools untraditional in the
sense that they
haven't been used for that purpose before?
Any thoughts about this?
Regards,
Lisa
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- References:
- [accessibleimage] Re: Question about art movement
- From: Jennifer Justice
Other related posts:
- » [accessibleimage] Question about art movement
- » [accessibleimage] Re: Question about art movement
- » [accessibleimage] Re: Question about art movement
- » [accessibleimage] Re: Question about art movement
- » [accessibleimage] Re: Question about art movement
It would seem to me that artistic movments (particularly Western artistic movements) tend to evolve out of a set of shared aesthetic, theoretical, or ideological principles rather than a technological advance or the novel application of technology for making art. If there is a movement comprised of blind artists/ disabled artists (and I believe there is- check out the Bodies of Work Festival that took place in Chicago in Aprl for a good example), then that movement is motivated by sociological/ politcal factors more than by technological innovations, Even if a bunch of people started making Braille embosser art and their was a nationwide craze for it, it would probably fall under the category of a new artistic medium as opposed to a movement. Another way of explaining it would be that PhotoShop users do not comprise an artistic movement but what some digital artists do with it could be thought of in that way.
Great question Lisa!
Jennifer
--- Lisa Yayla <fnugg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, Was wondering about something.
Elizabeth Goldring uses the ophthalmoscope as a
medium for artist expression. I was having a discussion a bit back
with an artist about using an embosser to create art. Isn't this a new
trend? Using tools that are specifically meant for the visually
impaired to create visual and tactile art? Of course I know there are many
visually impaired artist but aren't these tools untraditional in the
sense that they haven't been used for that purpose before?
Any thoughts about this?
Regards, Lisa
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
- [accessibleimage] Re: Question about art movement
- From: Jennifer Justice