[accessibleimage] Benodebehari Mukherjee, gardens, innovation,book
- From: Lisa Yayla <fnugg@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: accessibleimage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Access to Art Museums <artbeyondsightmuseums@xxxxxxxxxx>, art_beyond_sight_advocacy@xxxxxxxxxx, Art Beyond Sight Educators List <art_beyond_sight_educators@xxxxxxxxxx>, art_beyond_sight_theory_and_research@xxxxxxxxxxx, art_beyond_sight_learning_tools@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 10:54:06 +0100
Hi,
A few links. A very interesting article about Benodebehari Mukherjee an
Indian painter, innovation at the School of Engineering Univ Wisc., a
sensory garden and a book review.
Best,
Lisa
http://www.sflorg.com/comm_center/?p=399
Undergraduate invention competition slated for Feb 8-9
Universtity of Wisconsin-Madison
excerpt
Tactile Feedback for the blind, a computer touch screen with sound
feedback and tactile tongue stimulation that enables blind users to more
easily usea a computer (Justin Beck, Nathan Klapoetke, Jason, Malinowski)
Personal audio Feedback Sonar, a hat to help the blind and visually
impaired navigate by emitting audio signals
article
http://www.cdispatch.com/articles/2007/02/03/local_news/area_news/area01.txt
book review excerpt
Shattered Nerves: How Science Is Solving Modern Medicine's Most
Perplexing Problem, by Victor D. Chase, Johns Hopkins University Press,
289 pages, $32.50
Once the stuff of science fiction and hokey TV drama (who remembers The
Six Million Dollar Man?), neural prosthetics -- implants that enable the
blind to see, the deaf to hear and the paralyzed to move -- are now a
reality.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070203.BKBREF03/TPStory/Entertainment
article
http://www.newsleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070128/NEWS01/70128001/1002
Article published Jan 28, 2007
Making scents of a garden
Sensory garden enhances experience for the blind
STAUNTON — Phyllis Campbell loves the gentle rustle of leaves on a maple
tree, the quiet comfort of her living room at sunset and the sweet smell
of a rose on her dining room table.
But Campbell has never seen a maple tree, the setting sun or the color
of a rose — whether it’s sunny yellow or powder pink. Campbell is blind.
Although unable to see, Campbell, a teacher, has not missed out on the
luxurious smells and calming effects of plants. Her husband, Chuck, ran
a nursery in Churchville for many years. He brought home different
herbs, she felt each leaf’s texture and the aroma of sweet basil and sage.
Campbell loves plants, but walking through a garden is difficult. The
grass often covers up holes in the soil, the paths usually meanders —
sometimes ending without justification, and because most gardens are
designed to show off color as opposed to aroma, sometimes there is
simply brilliant hues.
In May, Campbell will have a place to share, as Staunton launches the
first blind-accessible professionally planted garden in Virginia. With
the help of the Talking Books Center, the city of Staunton, the Staunton
Public Library and the Brenda Papke Memorial Committee, a 2,000 square
foot triangular-shaped garden named after Brenda Papke, founder of the
Children’s Art Network, will open on the north end of the library lawn.
As well as having Braille signs and maps and a taped tour, the garden
will be accessible for people who can’t easily walk.
“This community, since 1839, has opened its heart to the visually
impaired,” Campbell said. “A garden is something that the disabled can
share with the community. A garden that is reaching out to all the
citizens is especially beautiful.”
The city’s horticulturist, Matthew Sensabaugh, has designed a
utilitarian, yet attractive, walkway. He’s researched which plants offer
the best scents, where to place flowers that attract bees and which
trees have rhythmical tones when they rustle in the winds.
“We’ll incorporate some herbs, sweet bay magnolia, a butterfly bush and
witch hazel, he said. “We want things that would bloom with different
fragrances throughout the year.”
Making sure that the plants can withstand touch and are
climate-appropriate is essential.
Oakley Pearson, the director of the Talking Book Center, which is housed
at the library, is instrumental in helping design the garden.
“The garden is a wonderful thing for everybody,” he said. “You can hear,
smell and touch to enjoy. It’s a place of relaxation, stimulation and
learning.”
It will also be a place of beauty, said Pam Huggins, who has spearheaded
the campaign to raise money for the blind and handicapped accessible
Brenda Papke Memorial Sensory Garden.
“Brenda believed strongly that art should be seen as a gift, a gift that
should be used to enrich and uplift others,” Huggins said. “She would
have loved it (the garden).”
The garden, Brenda’s gift to the community of beautifully landscaped
natural art, will coincide with her eldest child, Lauren, graduating
from the College of William and Mary.
“Brenda enjoyed bringing exciting ideas to life,” said Papke’s widower,
Bob Andersen. “She would have liked the fact that it’s all not about her.”
Others are invited to memorialize loved ones or donate to the garden
that will be accessible to all.
“A garden speaks to the person within. It reaches everyone,” Campbell
said. “My husband will be excited to take me to it. He can share what he
sees with me, and I can share my feelings about flowers and what they
smell like.”
---------------
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Art_/Colours_on_the_minds_retina/articleshow/1556817.cms
The Economic Times Online
Colours on the mind’s retina
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 03, 2007 03:48:50 AM]
Modern man is cursed with too much of seeing. His every waking moment is
suffused and saturated with objects, images, concepts and signs. Such is
this profusion of forms that he neither has time nor the inclination to
really see what he has to see. And he is oblivious of the virtues of
blindness. But can blindness be a virtue? The ongoing retrospective of
painter Benodebehari Mukherjee — who had a congenitally defective
vision, went completely blind in 1957 aged 53, and yet continued to
paint for another 23 years — alludes to the visual richness that
blindness, and its seeking, can sometimes yield.
There is a lot of variety in Mukherjee’s art. But what brings them
together is the unity of his aesthetic approach, which sought tirelessly
to overcome the world of objects and optical verisimilitude and
penetrate their essence. Much of his work, post blindness, is
characterised by an almost complete disappearance of opticality, with
objects being reduced to their archetypes. Not surprisingly, the human
and animal figures of his paper-cuts and collages lack eyes. Two of his
post-’57 lithographs — Curd Seller and Kitchen — are examples of how
objects are merely alibis for the artist to explore various interactions
among certain essential forms and structures.
But his creations, even before he lost his sight, are marked by a
struggle to escape objects and their sheer optical presence. From the
very beginning, Mukherjee, as his art indicates, was interested not in
things but in relationships among them. Even his self-portraits explore
relationships between physiognomy and the character of his inner being.
Mukherjee was also drawn to forces that constitute figures and objects,
rather than the finished ‘things’ themselves. His Artist Observing a
Frog is more about capturing the state of two human figures looking at a
frog than the visual event per se. This yearning for non-opticality
brings Mukherjee close to Anglo-Irish painter Francis Bacon, despite
their distance in space and tradition. The field of Bacon’s paintings
lacks depth, and he situates his figures in a way that it appears they
are dissolving. Clearly then, Mukherjee, an important member of the
Bengal school, was not the only one to have quested after artistic
blindness: a metaphor for capturing the unseen in art that is all about
seeing. But his loss of vision became a dramatic, physical culmination
of this search.
Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk, who is preoccupied by this aesthetic of
‘non-seeing’, gives a detailed account of the tradition of
blindness-seeking among the 12th-13th century masters of Perso-Islamic
miniatures in My Name is Red. They considered blindness to be the
supreme accomplishment of their artistic métier, so much so they would
often pierce their own eyes with needles specially designed for the
purpose. For them, blindness implied the victory of sacred timeless
vision over profane human gaze.
The human eye is a compulsive ejaculator of meaning. It is also a
repository of pre-conceived notions and ideas. Objects are rendered
meaningful only within cages of concepts and forms cast on to them.
There is no room for the object to show itself autonomously. Blindness,
in such circumstances, is the decimation of the predetermined gaze, if
only to set the object free. It’s driven by, what French philosopher
Gaston Bachelard chose to call, “material imagination” vis-a-vis “formal
imagination”. The former seeks to shun all formal preconceptions to
experience the world directly in its essential and elemental materiality.
Mukherjee’s attempt to penetrate the visual realm to get to the
essences, chimes with Swiss painter Paul Klee’s. The deliberate
infantilism and primitivity in Klee’s paintings allude to the elemental
world beyond the realm of our fabricated modern reality. Klee’s search
for essences was driven by a desire to go back to the roots of the “art
image”.
Mukherjee’s ‘blind search’ resonates with the ancient mystic traditions
of Bengal: of Ramakrishna, the Bauls and Lalanpanthis, Chaitanya and
Aatish Dipankara, the10th-11th century Buddhist monk from erstwhile east
Bengal, who journeyed to Tibet to revive Tantric Buddhism. Such
mysticism emphasised the dissolution of the individual and his gaze into
the world. The idea of non-seeing, which emerged from such mysticism, is
not as simple as seeing or saying nothing. It’s, in fact, seeing and
saying much more than eyes and language can afford. It is faith, not in
the sense of submitting to an impenetrable reality, but a state of
absolute transparency between the human being and his world so as to
preclude any attempt by the former to invade and know the latter.
Mukherjee’s decision to paint the 8-foot high, 80-foot long Life of
Medieval Saints mural on the three walls of Visva Bharati’s Hindi Bhavan
was not pure chance. The mural, a seamless tapestry of Surdas, Kabir,
Ravidas, Tulsidas, Guru Govind Singh and other medieval Bhakti figures,
is an expression of his historical vision that has little to do with the
nationalistic grand narratives of his time. In its compositeness, the
mural is shot through with the history of Bhakti, not only in the choice
of subject but, more importantly, in its vision. History in this mural —
which brings together the lives of various medieval saints separated in
time and space — is not a mere chronology of events that were seen by
human eyes as having unfolded in time. It is an experience, elusive to
human eyes, of a timeless emotion.
In his Shilpa Jigyasa (Art’s Quest), Mukherjee privileges the world of
the primitive anonymous craftsman, ready to dissolve into his tradition,
over that of the modern artist with his individual’s ego and gaze.
However, his return to the ‘blind’ tradition of the artisan was much too
modern and ironical to replicate the ‘repetitiveness’ of artisanal
craftsmanship in art. It was all about reclaiming the pre-modern ethos
of being one with the world.
That helped him free both his memory and imagination from the culturally
ingrained habits of seeing and allowed the visual world in his
imagination to be mediated by the other four senses. Mukherjee ardently
embraced such synaesthesia. He famously distinguished colours by touch
after he went blind. His works of that period, even while being visual,
have a distinctly tactile quality, too.
Funes, the Memorious, written by Argentine fabulist Jorge Luis Borges —
who like Mukherjee continued to work even after he went blind — is an
acutely prescient celebration of blindness. The eponymous protagonist of
the fable, who is able to remember every small visual detail after a
physically crippling accident, is, however, unable to think. That’s
because thought is generalisation, which entails forgetting much of what
we have sensed. Funes, for Borges, is an arch-example of a human being
whose imagination and memory are condemned to the prison of the visual.
The ‘blind’ art of Benodebehari Mukherjee, on the other hand, is an
intimation of how human beings could one day become more human, and free!
links
http://www.anothersubcontinent.com/forums/index.php?s=8ff9b96e3a5f875a16d4f843e9ded63d&showtopic=6487&pid=114571&st=0&#entry114571
http://www.ngmaindia.gov.in/benodebehari.asp
Other related posts:
- » [accessibleimage] Benodebehari Mukherjee, gardens, innovation,book