You will often find that organisations who provide free training use untrained and unskilled volunteers. Totally unacceptable that they should do this. Just because something is free does not mean it should be sub-standard.
Kind Regards Find me on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/barkingbabs Barbara Wilson M: 07917710779 T: 02887784046 E: barkingbabs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx IM: creativeeyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Skype: creativeeyes----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Moore" <mikeis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 8:16 PM Subject: [access-uk] Re: Website preferences
Hello, Can I add my two pennies worth? My local Social Services paid for training for a gentleman, who was blind, starting to use a computer. The RNIB started offering "free" training,instantly stopping the paid training. The volunteer doing the training fromthe RNIB had no experience with JAWS, muddled the gent's computer up and left him high and dry. Now Social Services will not pay for any further training, as this free option is available.... And by the way option C and as with others, it is tiresome, as the RNIBare supposed to have their "finger on the pulse". Regards, Mike (I'm not bitter!) :) -----Original Message-----From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfEgan, Bim Sent: 09 March 2011 10:13 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: Website preferencesThat's a very good point, and I'll certainly put the suggestion in front ofsomeone who could do something with it. In fact, the same person who inspired this poll is also frustrated by the lack of training provision. In a recent government push to get more older people to use computers, she was doubly frustrated to learn that the training available couldn't cope with any AT needs. Thanks, Bim -----Original Message-----From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfBarry Hill Sent: 09 March 2011 10:06 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: Website preferences I would argue that the answer to the problem you posed is assessment,training and support at an early stage. I believe that a computer, scannerand relevant software is an essential piece of kit for vip. Considerationfor this equipment should be in Social Service assessments of needs and thetraining to use it to be given alongside independent living skills. Perhaps the RNIB could put this suggestion to local authorities. Cheers Barry -----Original Message-----From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfEgan, Bim Sent: 09 March 2011 9:25 AM To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: Website preferences Hi Ian and Colin, We have always held the view that inclusion is what blind and partially sighted people want, but this has been challenged recently. Someone asked the not unreasonable question, "How do you know, have you asked?" The honest answer to that was that we hadn't. We've held the view on thebasis of general moves in accessibility, views of VI people we know as well as our personal views. The question now is to see whether we were right orwrong. I'll fill in a bit more background here. There are screen reading systemsthat can't cope with modern web site techniques, and people, often those whoare new to blindness and new to computers, who find the volumes of information difficult to deal with. What's the answer for these people? Thanks, Bim -----Original Message-----From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfColin Fowler Sent: 09 March 2011 09:16 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: Website preferences No, it is very disappointing that the technical lead for the RNIB's web accessibility team is allowing doubt about web accessibility to influence and ask such questions. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Iain Lackie" <ilackie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:08 AM Subject: [access-uk] Re: Website preferencessurely the answer is obviously C. Design should be inclusive and Ithinkwe have seen too many examples of "special" sites not having all the facilities of the main site or not being properly maintained. I can'tevensee why the question is being asked. Iain -----Original Message----- From: Egan, Bim Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 7:29 AM To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Website preferences Hi, Apologies if you see this on other lists ... My name's Bim Egan, I'm the technical lead for RNIB's web access team. Web designers sometimes look to RNIB for guidance on whatsight-impairedpeople need to make a site accessible. Though we have no power to insist that they take our advice, we want to make sure that what wesayis right for you and others . Could you help us please, by saying which of the following threeoptions(A, B or C) would be more likely to suit your needs? A. a text-only site, mirroring the main site with all its features;orB. A separate, simplified site made easier for sight-impaired people, but with the risk of missing out on some of the features on the main site; or Option C: If it's possible, one website that is accessible foreveryone,sighted and unsighted. Option B could mean extra cost for web designers, which they may not like to incur. On the other hand some people who work entirely fromthekeyboard tell us that Options A and C can mean far too many keystrokesfor them. Question: Would it be a good idea for RNIB, as policy, to encourage designers of the more popular or important sites for independent living, (grocery sites for example) to produce an option B version? Thank you. Bim -- DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarilyrepresentthose of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk This message has been scanned for viruses by Websense Hosted Security-http://www.websense.com/content/HostedEmailSecurity.aspx ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq To report this e-mail as Spam, please forward it to: spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5940 (20110309) __________The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq