[access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system
- From: Chris Moore <moore.c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 07:58:59 +0100
Snow Leopard was more of a patch than an huge OS update, hence why it was so
cheap. OS X usually costs about £80 for a full upgrade.
On 19 May 2011, at 21:02, ANDY COLLINS wrote:
> Gordon - Was that upgrade from Leopard to Snow Leopard a full upgrade,
> equivalent to upgrading from Windows XP to Vista say? -
>
> Andy
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gordon Keen" <gordonkeen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 8:20 PM
> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices
> for the next apple operating system
>
>
>> Hi
>>
>> When I upgraded from leopard to snow leopard it cost me thirty quid but that
>> included the upgrade to voice over so it cost me just the same as a sighted
>> person to upgrade - I couldn't argue with that!
>>
>> When switching to apple you really need to get your head around the fact
>> that accessibility is a given and this is at the heart of the apple
>> philosophy - they are not paying lip service and they are not trying to make
>> a fast profit out of you because you are blind.
>>
>> Scary isn't it?
>>
>> G
>>
>> From Bridgerule in glorious Devon, england.
>> Catch the buzz at http://www.bridgerule.co.uk
>>
>> On 19 May 2011, at 19:54, Jackie Cairns wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andy
>>>
>>> I have never upgraded a Mac, and neither has Martin. We have both only done
>>> software updates to the existing operating system as you do on Windows. But
>>> we have never paid for any upgrades. I understand there is a major upgrade
>>> coming out later this year, but don't know how much it will cost. Gordon,
>>> being much more experienced than either of us, could enlighten?
>>>
>>> But when you think of the money we have paid over the years to constantly
>>> update JAWS, it runs into thousands if you count the SMAs, and I don't think
>>> anyone using a Mac would claim to have forked out a quarter of that sum. I
>>> guess Apple recoups its money by charging more for its products at the
>>> outset. Let's face it, there isn't such a thing as a free lunch with these
>>> companies. I commend Apple's accessibility approach, but you do pay for it
>>> when buying their products because they cost more.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
>> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
>> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ** and in the Subject line type
>> ** unsubscribe
>> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
>> ** immediately-following link:-
>> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
>> ** or send a message, to
>> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
- References:
- [access-uk] New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system
- [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system
Other related posts:
- » [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system - Jackie Cairns
- » [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system - Gordon Keen
- » [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system - ANDY COLLINS
- » [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system - Chris Moore
- » [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system - Tristram Llewellyn
- » [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system - Gordon Keen
- » [access-uk] Re: Updating a Mac was, Apps for the Mac, was New voices for the next apple operating system - ANDY COLLINS