[access-uk] Re: Sight Village this year?

  • From: "yusuf" <hansel.osman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 14:35:27 +0100

Steve, Will this wap access work on the 9210I communicator? and is there any
information on possible costs to upgrade to it?
Yusuf
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Nutt" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 12:21 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Sight Village this year?


> Hi.
>
> Just to add to Ray's excellent summing up, we were demonstrating two
firsts=
> =20
> for us this year.  Talks with WAP access, so that one can browse the=20
> Internet, coming to a phone near you soon.  Also, Talks using a
commercial=
> =20
> GPS package, which is only in its beginnings, but a really exciting
product=
> =20
> already, especially as the GPS receiver uses Bluetooth technology and
is=20
> very small.  Also, the phone downloads maps from a central server as it=20
> needs them, or should I say routes.  This means that if you go
seriously=20
> off track, the phone will simply re-calculate your route, without you=20
> asking it to.  This of course, is optional, as you can turn
auto-tracking=20
> on and off.
>
> I didn't like our exhibition space, as the table was above two steps,
so=20
> the customers had to come to the bottom of the steps and look up at us,
but=
> =20
> there was more room for the exhibitors.
>
> Over all, it has been the best year ever for Computer Room Services.
>
> All the best
>
> At 11:09 16/07/2004, Ray's Home spake these words of wisdom
>  >Hi Andrew.
>  >
>  >Trust the new job is going OK.  I am surprised that no one as yet seems
to
>  >have weighed in with their thought on Sight Village, and I'll only give=
>  you
>  >a few impressions here.
>  >
>  >The venue.  If I had to come down for or against, I'd say, marginally,
its
>  >an improvement on QAC.  For me the main downside of the layout of the
>  >exhibition was that the main hall, or halls, were next door to one
another
>  >and there was a lot of noise spill-over which made speech products very=
>  hard
>  >to hear.  Really what is needed is for exhibitors with speech/hardware
>  >products to have screened off areas, while those displaying mainly
>  >information and quieter products could be together in a larger area.
>  >
>  >The whole thing was more compact though, even though it was spread over
>  >three levels if you include the mezomine area.  Seminar rooms were good
>  >though.
>  >
>  >Speaking of seminars, GW Micro's presentation was a little lack-lustre.
=
>  Dan
>  >Weirich hammered home the stability advantage with W-E and someone got a
>  >baseball cap for recognizing that, but I thought he could have=
>  demonstrated
>  >the private beta there, as well as downstairs.  I could also be wrong=
>  here,
>  >but he didn't seem to make anything of the fact that a remote computer
>  >running Window-Eyes could be accessed with a machine that (doesn't) have
>  >Window-Eyes on it.  No, I do not think I have got this wrong, for as
far=
>  as
>  >I know, you can access W-E with a thin client if it has sound attached.
>  >Someone put me right if I am wrong on this, please.
>  >
>  >On the portable magnifier front, I found the 'tin can' cameras=
>  demonstrated
>  >by New Vision quite acceptable for the price and they were very
portable.
>  >The idea is you hook up to a SCART on a TV, or via a box to a computer
>  >monitor where you can switch between the two images.  The option
including=
>  a
>  >small LCD display - which also might be a TV, was selling for =A3550.00.
=
>  I'l
>  >post more on that if anyone is interested.
>  >
>  >In the crazy, 'you must be joking' class, we had Professional vision
>  >demonstrating an elegant camera on stand to plug into a laptop along
with
>  >software for screen splitting.  That will be =A33,000 sir.  Not bluddy=
>  likely.
>  >Think it was from a German firm called Steller, who were also there.
>  >
>  >Before leaving the subject of CCTV, I was interested in the device
Andrew
>  >mentioned in his post, and would be interested in a critical review of
it,
>  >if you are still reading this Andrew, (smile).
>  >
>  >Braille products.  I was interested in the Braillino which seemed a very
>  >neat and sturdy device.  Though its a Braille input and notetaking
device,
>  >it has no inbuilt speech, but that's not a problem if you are using with
a
>  >laptop with speech on board.  Sure Steve will come in on improvements,
but
>  >of course you can use it with a mobile.  Think it comes from Handitech
who
>  >may be associated with the software that makes mobiles talk.
>  >
>  >I saw the Braillenote PK, and very nice and solid it was too.  As well
as
>  >being a bit heavy on the pocket - well aren't they always! - you would=
>  need
>  >a pretty deep and stirdy pocket to put it in.  I didn't see Mr. Mozan,=
>  which
>  >was a bit of a disappointment.  Whatever you think of Pulsedata, and
not=
>  all
>  >opinions are flattering to them, I must say they always have a very
>  >professional looking stand and display, and Pedro Pulson was out there
on
>  >reception handing out leaflets with Braille and Print summarizing there
>  >products.  Didn't see anyone else doing that.  It does no harm at all,
in=
>  my
>  >view, to approach blind people in a civilized way to tell what they
have=
>  on
>  >show, after all, we can not see what there is until we are told.
>  >
>  >The only other product that comes to mind is the Index embossers.  These
>  >have been upgraded to include USB and networkablility.  Also, they are
>  >moving towards being able to use several embossers in tandom, so that if
>  >customers needs exspand, then they can just add another embosser in
>  >parallel.  Waht a noise!   Of course they are introducing a cabinet that
>  >will hold four embossers and hopefully forstall those claims for loss of
>  >hearing.
>  >
>  >No doubt some of you will have heard George on In touch commenting on
the
>  >cost of being at SV now.  To my mind, the guy from QAC didn't really
put=
>  up
>  >any credible defence, other than its a more exspensive venue to hire.
It
>  >was very noticable how cramped the space for some exhibitors was, and I=
>  have
>  >alreay already mentioned the noise spill problem.  All this for a more=
>  than
>  >100% price hike to exhibitors?  Well, what do you folk think?  You might
>  >also ponder whether 'charities' should be asking themselves whether
they=
>  are
>  >in fact a charity or a business.  Are you listening, RNIB?  Oh, sorry,
I=
>  am
>  >not a member.  Was forgetting.  How silly of me.
>  >
>  >Se you at Share the Vision, (smile).
>  >
>  >Ray.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >----- Original Message -----
>  >From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  >To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  >Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 9:10 PM
>  >Subject: [access-uk] Sight Village this year?
>  >
>  >
>  >Hi,
>  >
>  >I normally try and get to Sight Village and do a summing up on this list
>  >for people who could not be there, but could someone do it for me this
>  >year as I was at work all day?
>  >
>  >Anything interesting?  Each year I go thinking there won't be much
>  >there, but there is always one piece of equipment which really is worth
>  >looking at.  The two pieces for me this year have been the Pacmate from
>  >Freedom Scientific, and the Quick Look from Ash technologies.  Access to
>  >work got me both pieces whilst starting work, and while the Pacmate is
>  >good as expected, I never thought that an electronic magnifier would
>  >actually benefit me the way it has done!  The down side to the magnifier
>  >is now I have to fax/photocopy a lot of documents, as I can see the
>  >relevant display!
>  >
>  >Thanks,
>  >Andrew.
>  >** Going on holiday and want to halt messages? Send a message to:-
>  >** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  >** and in the Subject line type
>  >** vacation ## d
>  >** where ## is the number of days followed by d for days.
>  >** For other things like digest mode, send a message, to
>  >** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>  >
>  >
>  >** Going on holiday and want to halt messages? Send a message to:-
>  >** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  >** and in the Subject line type
>  >** vacation ## d
>  >** where ## is the number of days followed by d for days.
>  >** For other things like digest mode, send a message, to
>  >** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>
> --
> Computer Room Services:  the long cane for blind computer users.
> Telephone Voice:  +44(0)1438 742286, Fax/BBS:  +44(0)1438 759589
> Telephone mobile:  +44(0)7956 334938, Email:  Steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Web site:  http://www.comproom.co.uk
> --
> For a company brochure, send an empty message to Info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, and get regular updates, please send a message to
> listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Just put the word "subscribe updates" without
> the quotes in the body of the message.  To join the tutorials list,
> where we discuss Brian Hartgen's tutorials, please do exactly as above,
> but in the body of the message, put the words "subscribe tutorials",
> again, without the quotes.
>
>
> ** Going on holiday and want to halt messages? Send a message to:-
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** vacation ## d
> ** where ## is the number of days followed by d for days.
> ** For other things like digest mode, send a message, to
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>


** Going on holiday and want to halt messages? Send a message to:-
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** vacation ## d
** where ## is the number of days followed by d for days.
** For other things like digest mode, send a message, to 
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq

Other related posts: