[access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment?
- From: "ANDY COLLINS" <Andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:17:12 +0100
Mike - sadly, I think the answer to your last question is yes--I never buy specialist stuff for the blind when I can find a suitable alternative, as in my experience, it is too often unreliable, doesn't last the test of time, and often feels too big and too ugly! Andy ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Moore To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 5:48 PM Subject: [access-uk] Poor quality of equipment? Hello all, This is not strictly computer related, but involves accessibility equipment.... Does anyone know of a good quality talking tape measure; other than the Cobalt one? I have two of these, and a year is about the most I can get out of both them, as they always end up giving spurious measurements- such as 2513 inches when the tape is fully retracted. Replacing the battery etc does no good. Do we have to put up with inferior quality materials every time? Regards, A disgruntled Mike
- Follow-Ups:
- [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment?
- From: Lyn & Twinny
- [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment?
- From: spring.flower
- [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment?
- References:
- [access-uk] Poor quality of equipment?
- From: Mike Moore
- [access-uk] Poor quality of equipment?
Other related posts:
- » [access-uk] Poor quality of equipment? - Mike Moore
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - ANDY COLLINS
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - martin wilsher
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Lyn & Twinny
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - James AUSTIN
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Elliott Barnes
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - spring.flower
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - spring.flower
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - ANDY COLLINS
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - James AUSTIN
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Dean Wilcox
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - john coley
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - ANDY COLLINS
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - john coley
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Jackie Cairns
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Jackie Cairns
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - terry
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Jackie Cairns
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Mike Moore
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Mike Moore
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Steve Hyde-Dryden
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - David W Wood
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Jackie Cairns
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Mike Moore
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - >Lyn & Twinny
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Mike Moore
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Steve Hyde-Dryden
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Steve Nutt
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - James AUSTIN
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Mike Moore
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Jackie Cairns
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - James AUSTIN
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - James AUSTIN
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Jackie Cairns
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - James AUSTIN
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - angel238
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - Adrien Collins
- » [access-uk] Re: Poor quality of equipment? - James AUSTIN