Though I'm tacking my message onto what Sandra has said, I'm aware of Steve Nutt's later comments too. I wouldn'gt regard the Olypus DS50 as a 'pro' machine either, but that isn't to denegrate what it does. (In fact an argument could be had as to how 'pro' the R09 is, but I see no point in arguing about that.) People considering buying itshould, INHO, regard it as a conference/meeting/dictation machine which is entirely automatic record level wise, and also happens to have a fair measure of accessability which no mainstream competitor has at all. One situation I would like to hear it used in is interviews. It may well be that a good many who don't want to become 'techies' in any sense will want a relatively straight forward machine to take around with them which gets the job done well enough for say local talking newspapers or the odd Podcast. (No, I'm not suggesting Podcasting is it's main use, but given a sound editor that can import WMA files then that would be an obvious use for it.) As it is, with Studio Recorder at least, it seems that an intermediary conversion program would be necessary. Seems that Olypus might consider MP3 recording as an option if they are encouraged sufficiently by sales of the DS50 and its cheaper siblings. I'd also add that, anyone considering reviewing any recorder for portable use might give us some idea of it's use in interview situations. I'm always conscious of how much blind people have been denied effective employment opportunities in audio related work which is why I am interested in such a use for this machine, as well as other recorders, both more and less accessable than the DS50. From Ray I can be contacted off-list at: mailto:ray-48@xxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sandra Henshall I feel I must join Andy in defence of the Olympus DS50 here. I purchased one from Hagger Electronics and am more than satisfied with it. The unit is about 95 per cent accessible, which is good enough for me. I've also purchased a pair of BSM9 binaural microphones and am getting good quality recordings. It's easy to convert files from WMA to MP3. As usual, we've been ripped off here in Britain on the price but then what's new? I've also used the recorder as an MP3 player for film sound tracks and audio books and have no axe to grind with the quality of the playback. It's small and inconspicuous when taken outdoors and I think Olympus should be commended for making the effort to give us some sort of accessibility. I do wish people didn't always look for perfection; it doesn't exist. It seems to me that whatever a company tries to do to make their products usable by blind people, there will always be folks who are just never satisfied. The Olympus does exactly what I want and, like Andy, I have no regrets about buying one. Cheers, Sandra. ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq