[access-uk] Re: Fw: Response from Lloyds TSB re chip & pin at home

This is becoming a circular argument, Derek.  Someone has already pointed 
out that the chip and signature is a voluntary option, this new gadget is 
not.  It's either use it with sight, or tough.  Personally, I'd like the 
added security that the home chip and pin brings but, as I'm blind, it's not 
going to be available for me.

Barry

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Derek Hornby" <derek.hornby_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 10:50 AM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Fw: Response from Lloyds TSB re chip & pin at home


Barry said
"But, the current system relies on the customer proving that they have not
been negligent."

Same for  chip and signature.
It is safer to  use chip and pin in the shops, compared to chip and
signature, but for  those  customers bank takes son the extra  risk.

Regards,
Derek

e-mail: derek.hornby_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq

** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq

Other related posts: