[access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- From: "Ray's Home" <rays-home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:37:55 +0100
Ian. No, defenitely NO. Such dishonest utterances by RNIB are pure drivel.
The credit rests with Pure, and this list, I would say, for this radio
appearing.
True, RNIB have campaigned for accessability of products, but this New Beacon
proclamation is damn lies.
Ray
Personal emails: Email me at
mailto:ray-48@xxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: Iain Lackie
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 12:10 AM
Subject: [access-uk] Economical With The Truth?
Hello,
I have just been looking at the current issue of New Beacon and in the New
Products and Consumer news section there is a piece about the Pure Digital
Sonus-1Xt. Having eulogised about its features, we read the sentence, 'All of
this, and much more, is available now from the latest product launched by RNIB.
My dictionary tells me that one of the meanings of 'launch' is ''To bring (a
new product) on to the market, especially with promotions and publicity'. This
product may be new to the RNIB catalogue, but can they really be said to have
launched it? Was the radio really available from RNIB before anyone else? Can
RNIB take any real credit for this product? It is I am sure agood thing that
RNIB is selling the product, but, unless I am mistaken (and this is very
likely to be the case), Can RNIB in any truly meaningful sense claim to have
launched it?
Iain.
- References:
- [access-uk] Economical With The Truth?
- From: Iain Lackie
Other related posts:
- » [access-uk] Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- » [access-uk] Re: Economical With The Truth?
- [access-uk] Economical With The Truth?
- From: Iain Lackie