[access-uk] Re: Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
- From: "Steve Nutt" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:04:33 -0000
Hi Eleanor,
No it is not free, but well worth the money you pay.
http://www.diskeeper-europe.com <http://www.diskeeper-europe.com/> .
All the best
Steve
_____
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Eleanor Burke
Sent: Monday 19 January 2009 18:28
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
Is disckeeper free. If yes where can I download it from?
Eleanor
----- Original Message -----
From: Vanja Sudar <mailto:vanja@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 4:45 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
What I personally like about disckeeper is that you don't have to do
anything. It runs as a windows service, defrags on it's own, optimising it
appropriately depending on if computer is idle or in use.
Vanja
http://www.sudar.co.uk
http://mashupradio.net
MSN/windows live messenger: sudar23@xxxxxxxxxxx
AIM: vanja121
Skype: vanja121
----- Original Message -----
From: Ibrahim <mailto:ibrahim_gucukoglu@xxxxxxxx> Gucukoglu
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:41 AM
Subject: [access-uk] Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
Hi Everyone.
I've been looking in to this product Diskeeper which people seem to be able
to work well with. What I want to know is what performance enhancements it
will bring me over the standard windows defrag which I've been using up till
now on a scheduled basis when I'm not using the computer.
_____
I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len>
We are a community of 5.8 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 1140 of my spam emails to date.
The Professional version does not have this message
Other related posts:
