[access-uk] Re: Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
- From: "Vanja Sudar" <vanja@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:02:04 -0000
It's not free. You can get it and find out more info about it at
http://www.diskeeper.com/
Vanja
http://www.sudar.co.uk
http://mashupradio.net
MSN/windows live messenger: sudar23@xxxxxxxxxxx
AIM: vanja121
Skype: vanja121
----- Original Message -----
From: Eleanor Burke
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 6:28 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
Is disckeeper free. If yes where can I download it from?
Eleanor
----- Original Message -----
From: Vanja Sudar
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 4:45 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
What I personally like about disckeeper is that you don't have to do
anything. It runs as a windows service, defrags on it's own, optimising it
appropriately depending on if computer is idle or in use.
Vanja
http://www.sudar.co.uk
http://mashupradio.net
MSN/windows live messenger: sudar23@xxxxxxxxxxx
AIM: vanja121
Skype: vanja121
----- Original Message -----
From: Ibrahim Gucukoglu
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:41 AM
Subject: [access-uk] Diskeeper 2009 versus standard defrag
Hi Everyone.
I've been looking in to this product Diskeeper which people seem to be
able to work well with. What I want to know is what performance enhancements
it will bring me over the standard windows defrag which I've been using up till
now on a scheduled basis when I'm not using the computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter
We are a community of 5.8 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 1140 of my spam emails to date.
The Professional version does not have this message
Other related posts: