CHILDREN OF BESLAN FOLLOW0UPOK folks, I know dead horses could well be being flogged here, but how are these ' guidelines' changed and negotiated? Shouldn't we, or someone be in there asking for or demanding changes? I think an alt transmission placed very near the original could be one work around. Also, how about all the other stuff that Beeb2 smuggly transmit with blatant disregard of our access needs? Programmes like Correspondent which I gave up on years ago. Don't know if it is still transmitted. Also, how about beefing up the audio sub-channel? Why the tardy tortoise like progress on this one? Why have we nothing like parity with the deaf on this issue? These are all points that should be brought up and remodies should be forthcoming. Ray Personal emails: Email me at mailto:ray-48@xxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: Peter Logue To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 2:47 PM Subject: [access-uk] Re: CHILDREN OF BESLAN FOLLOW0UP Its because of the clause below that the BBC pulled their artistic card. However there may be exceptional occasions where it is necessary editorially for the voice to remain unchanged. They may arise where, for example, it is important to understand the emotion of a speaker giving personal testimony