Hi Ray "One company has, of course, amalgamated a CCD camera with reformatting of text and auto-scrolling, which could be a decided advantage. As usual, this comes at a price, a whapping price £3,000 I think... but I could foresee AISquared building in image capture to Zoomtext. In fact, they've been threatening to do just that for years, If you were in an office where you contstantly had to deal with large amounts of print, possibly doing copy typing then the cost would be more justified. As to Ai Squared and similar hybrid CCTVs you are correct, there has been no windows counterpard to Visability or BreaTech's CloseUP software, both which ran in DOS and were CCTV type replacements. The latter used OCR to reformat text for you. Regards. Tristram Llewellyn Sight and Sound Technology Technical Support www.sightandsound.co.uk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ray's Home" <rays-home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 12:05 PM Subject: [access-uk] Re: Are CCTVs that useful? Thanks Tristram. Good to have an historical perspective on CCTV. The hobbiest and working on electronic components is one aspect I'd forgotten, and a thing that I could imagine using a portable and easily placed CCTV camera to help me with. The tremendous drop in price of scanners, OCR software and the developments in screen magnification software also effectively limit the usefulness of CCTV, accept in the case of hand writing. That problem is as much to do with the legibility of individual hand-writing for me as it is to do with the size of it. One company has, of course, amalgamated a CCD camera with reformatting of text and auto-scrolling, which could be a decided advantage. As usual, this comes at a price, a whapping price £3,000 I think. When you consider that much of what is being done there in software as been around in similar fashion in Zoomtext, it seems O.T.T. to say the least. True, the camera's an innovation, but I could foresee AISquared building in image capture to Zoomtext. In fact, they've been threatening to do just that for years, although its never materialized as yet. Given the limited usefulness of CCTV nowadays, I'd encourage people who can see enough to read print at all to consider the alternatives for reading printed text. RAy. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tristram Llewellyn" <tris-l@xxxxxxxxxx> CCTVs today may seem rather less useful than perhaps they had done in the past, but this is somewhat to do with developments in technology over the last 30 years. Today there are a great variety of other methods of accessing print material, scanning with computers being one of the major developments, screen magnifiers etc. All of these give an alternative access to print which was not available then. A less well understood change has been in the field of very powerful LVA optics like handheld magnifiers with build in lights etc. That sort of thing did not get going until the early to mid seventies. The first CCTVs date back to the late sixties and would predate some of those developments. Indeed when I was in a school for the partially sighted CCTVs were very much in evidence, some of which were already years old. The capacity of the CCTV to magnify text far beyond factors that optics of a comparable era meant that it was the only way for some to practically access print with sight. If you fell below this threshold it was the opticon or braille. I haven't operated a CCTV in years, but there is something of a skill to it which has to be acquired. Even so it will never be as immediate as reading print directly, I don't think any technology is really going to sort this out anytime soon. Though not all who have CCTV use them for print, I heard of someone using one of the new breed of LCD portable magnifiers to investigate electronic circuit boards and parts, it has it's own build in light which I imagine is rather handy. Regards. Tristram Llewellyn Sight and Sound Technology Technical Support www.sightandsound.co.uk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ray's Home" <rays-home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> This question is, of course, prompted by tonight's In Touch. Maybe the worth of training, and what Goverment or large charities can do to ease the affordability of access equipment will be commented on further. It's CCTVs that are occupying my thoughtsjust now though. I apologise again if this is pretty rambling, but I hope it may get a little response. I'm sure some will answer 'Yes!' to my question. Maybe, as in so many things, I'm the odd one out; but I am someone who might be thought to be your stereotypical user, of CCTV if amount of eyesight is the prime consideration. Yet I've never felt a great urge to have one. My accuity is around 2-3x20. Certainly registable as blind, which I have been since age eight. I've always made good use of the little sight I have. I taught myself to read print using an x10 glass, given me by an optition who was belwildered about what to offer me. It was just what I needed. From then on I read Practical Wireless, comics and anything that took my fancy, including, sometimes, newspapers. At first CCTV seemed a brilliant idea. But when I realised how cumbersome they were, both in size and in use - moving that table around all the time, and trying to find what you wanted - I was much less impressed. By the price too! I mean, a thousand quid or more for a camera a CRT and a few controls, not very different from a TV, to twiddle? I've modified my opinion since, but still do not see, (smile) the big deal. Not for me. I still read a lot with an x10, these days with in-built LED light. I read whole novels, quite slowly of course, but quickly enough to get great enjoyment. I also use audio books from time to time too. Not to mention BBC7 and Oneword. OK, the last two radio options do not give you what you want, when you want, but still I get a good deal from those sources. So who is the clientel for these marvelous CCTVs? Older people who have lost a fair deal of eyesight is one group. I suspect many are very quickly disappointed though as they never get anywhere near the ease and speed of reading they were used to when they had normal sight. Judging by the numbers of used CCTVs I used to see in New Beacon, I think I might be right here. Maybe some younger people have been steered in the CCTV direction and also maybe resist the ways of the blind in tackling reading, as though its the final admission of defeat to use audio. I suspect too that some helpers and professionals feel much more at ease with a group and a method coser to their own visual way of doing things. Maybe I am forgetting that some want this method to deal with short corespondence and the like. As for using them to fill in forms, even here I do not get the point. I often use my magnifier for that too. Or sometimes I am happy for someone else to do it if its not urgent. I suppose a more fomfortable posture is an advantage. So folks, who uses CCTV? For what? And, do you feel its worth the often considerable outlay? I would say that some of the more reasonable offerings from New Vision and one or two others may help change my mind. Much more compact, much less desk hogs. And I could see myself using such devices maybe for map reading, or a little copy typing. But for reading novels, give me my trusty x10 any day. Oh, did I mention, I also read Braille? Well, very little these days, but I can read it fluently enough to enjoy using that medium too. Aren't I a lucky so and so? Ray. ** Going on holiday and want to halt messages? Send a message to:- ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** vacation ## d ** where ## is the number of days followed by d for days. ** For other things like digest mode, send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** Going on holiday and want to halt messages? Send a message to:- ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** vacation ## d ** where ## is the number of days followed by d for days. ** For other things like digest mode, send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq