Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[si-list] || [Date Prev] [12-2005 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [12-2005 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[SI-LIST] Re: Back of the envelope termination resistor calculation

  • From: Alex Horvath <alexh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:58:32 -0800 (PST)
As I remember it used to the case that typical drivers would sink almost twice 
the current that they sourced but there was a big push many years ago to make 
drivers symmetrical. I ran numbers on both pullup and pulldown and they were 
within 1 Ohm at 1.5V for example. 
   
   
  -----Original Message-----
From: Dan Bostan [mailto:dbostan@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:50 PM
To: alexh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Back of the envelope termination resistor calculation
   
  I think the resistance is different for a transition
  from "0" to "1" vs. a transition from "1" t "0".
  /dan
   
   
   
  --- Alex Horvath <alexh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
   
  > Hi,
  >    
  >   In the past when trying to determine if a series
  > term resistor is required or what the value should
  > be I would use the IBIS file to determine the
  > approximate output resistance of the gate. Also it
  > could be used to determine if incident wave
  > switching is possible which can often be a make or
  > break situation. I think I read about this technique
  > in Halls book but I'm not sure. I presently have
  > occasion to do that and although I know this is a
  > crude approximation I wanted to make sure that I was
  > doing it correctly.
  >    
  >   I'm referring to run of the mill LVTTL outputs
  > here.
  >    
  >   From the IBIS I determined the following from the
  > Pulldown curve (taking voltage and dividing by typ
  > current) -
  >    
  >   0.5V - 25 Ohms
  >   1.0V - 29 Ohms
  >   1.5V - 35 Ohms
  >   2.0V - 45 Ohms
  >    
  >   The thing that disturbs me here is that the
  > non-linearity is much higher than I would have
  > expected so perhaps this method should be applied
  > with extreme caution.
  >    
  >   I find it amazing that I still end up working with
  > experienced engineers that have little concept of
  > signal integrity or timing verification (hence the
  > unavailability of an SI tool at my current
  > employer). In my case my first job out of college
  > was designing avionics. Obviously avionics must be
  > completely reliable and we had a rule that all
  > interchip paths had to have a 20% timing margin so
  > the importance of "correct by design" was instilled
  > in me early in my career. 
  >    
  >   Of course in those days edge rates were relatively
  > slow so most paths could be treated as lumped and if
  > not the ridiculously high drive current of the
  > jellybean logic of that time allowed us to use
  > parallel terminations. Thus the 20% margin rule was
  > easy to apply from the device data sheets in most
  > cases.
  >    
  >   Thanks
  >    
  >    
  > 
  > 
  ------------------------------------------------------------------
  > To unsubscribe from si-list:
  > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
  > the Subject field
  > 
  > or to administer your membership from a web page, go
  > to:
  > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
  > 
  > For help:
  > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the
  > Subject field
  > 
  > List FAQ wiki page is located at:
  >                
  > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
  > 
  > List technical documents are available at:
  >                 http://www.si-list.org
  > 
  > List archives are viewable at:     
  >           http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
  > or at our remote archives:
  >           http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
  > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are
  > viewable at:
  >           http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  >   
  > 
  > 
   
   
  __________________________________________________
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
  http://mail.yahoo.com 
  ------------------------------------------------------------------
  To unsubscribe from si-list:
  si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
   
  or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
  http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
   
  For help:
  si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
   
  List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                  http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
   
  List technical documents are available at:
                  http://www.si-list.org
   
  List archives are viewable at:     
              http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
  or at our remote archives:
              http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
  Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
              http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
    
  

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  





[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.