
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[10-2007 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[10-2007 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: Balun measurement
- From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ron@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:38:39 -0700
Ron generally that is true. However, PSPL has an interesting Tx line
balun: 5310-104 that has very tight gain matching and phase linearity
over the 100MHz to 4GHz range.
Best Regards,
Steve.
ronald miller wrote:
> dont use baluns for measurements.... using network analyzers.
> They are only useful for narrowband applications...
>
> ron
>
> john wrote:
>
>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> I measured a 1:1 balun as a three port network, port 1 is the unbalanced
>> input, port 2 is the 'through' connection and port 3 is the indirect
>> connection. I only have a two port VNA so the unused ports were
>> terminated with 50 Ohms during the measurements
>>
>>
>> Port 1 -----OOOOOOOOO--------o Port 2
>> o-OOOOOOOOO--o
>> | |
>> | |
>> --- |
>> GND |
>> |
>> ----o Port 3
>>
>>
>>
>> With this 1:1 Balun the Balanced port has differential impedance of 50
>> Ohms so terminating with the VNA/terminator into 50 Ohms on say ports 2
>> and 3 gives a large impedance mismatch. The the application circuits for
>> the chip to which the balanced input connects shows a 100 Ohm resistance
>> directly across the pins of the balance port (2-3) which is then tracked
>> at 100 Ohms differential to the device where it is internally terminated
>> with 100 Ohms. Now using the same test board, I solder a resistor
>> (infarct three 300 Ohms in parallel) across ports 2 and 3 and re-measure
>> I have should have the correctly terminated case.
>>
>> I took the balun off the test board and measured the terminator across
>> ports 2 and 3.
>>
>> I then simulated the terminated case using the s-parameters from the
>> first measurement and those from the resistor only measurement and
>> compare them to the terminated case measurement.
>>
>> In general there is reasonable correlation in shape between S11, S22 and
>> S33. However the simulated S11 has less loss than the measurement of the
>> terminated case. the simulated S22 and S23 again have the same overall
>> shape as the measured results although the anti-resonances are not as great.
>>
>> The through S21/S12 S13/31 however show little correlation between the
>> simulated and measured results having large anti resonances where the
>> measured results do not.
>>
>> As this is part of an overall simulation I would like to get the Balun
>> measured and simulating correctly before addressing the rest of the
>> simulation.
>>
>>
>> Can anyone suggest a better way of measuring the balun ?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from si-list:
>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>>
>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>>
>> For help:
>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>>
>>
>> List technical documents are available at:
>> http://www.si-list.net
>>
>> List archives are viewable at:
>> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>> or at our remote archives:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Steve Weir
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
121 North River Drive
Narragansett, RI 02882
California office
(408) 884-3985 Business
(707) 780-1951 Fax
Main office
(401) 284-1827 Business
(401) 284-1840 Fax
Oregon office
(503) 430-1065 Business
(503) 430-1285 Fax
http://www.teraspeed.com
This e-mail contains proprietary and confidential intellectual property of
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teraspeed(R) is the registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|