
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[10-2007 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[10-2007 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: Balun measurement
- From: ronald miller <ron@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: johndp@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:37:33 -0700
dont use baluns for measurements.... using network analyzers.
They are only useful for narrowband applications...
ron
john wrote:
>All,
>
>
>I measured a 1:1 balun as a three port network, port 1 is the unbalanced
>input, port 2 is the 'through' connection and port 3 is the indirect
>connection. I only have a two port VNA so the unused ports were
>terminated with 50 Ohms during the measurements
>
>
>Port 1 -----OOOOOOOOO--------o Port 2
> o-OOOOOOOOO--o
> | |
> | |
> --- |
> GND |
> |
> ----o Port 3
>
>
>
>With this 1:1 Balun the Balanced port has differential impedance of 50
>Ohms so terminating with the VNA/terminator into 50 Ohms on say ports 2
>and 3 gives a large impedance mismatch. The the application circuits for
>the chip to which the balanced input connects shows a 100 Ohm resistance
>directly across the pins of the balance port (2-3) which is then tracked
>at 100 Ohms differential to the device where it is internally terminated
>with 100 Ohms. Now using the same test board, I solder a resistor
>(infarct three 300 Ohms in parallel) across ports 2 and 3 and re-measure
>I have should have the correctly terminated case.
>
>I took the balun off the test board and measured the terminator across
>ports 2 and 3.
>
>I then simulated the terminated case using the s-parameters from the
>first measurement and those from the resistor only measurement and
>compare them to the terminated case measurement.
>
>In general there is reasonable correlation in shape between S11, S22 and
>S33. However the simulated S11 has less loss than the measurement of the
>terminated case. the simulated S22 and S23 again have the same overall
>shape as the measured results although the anti-resonances are not as great.
>
>The through S21/S12 S13/31 however show little correlation between the
>simulated and measured results having large anti resonances where the
>measured results do not.
>
>As this is part of an overall simulation I would like to get the Balun
>measured and simulating correctly before addressing the rest of the
>simulation.
>
>
>Can anyone suggest a better way of measuring the balun ?
>
>
>Regards
>
>
>John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
>List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
>List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
>
--
Ronald Miller
Ghz Data, Signal Integrity Consulting
7721 Sunset Ave.
Newark CA 94560
tel 510-793-4744
cell 510-377-9380
fax 510-742-6686
www.ghzdata.com
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: text/x-vcard
-- File: ron.vcf
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|