
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[09-2001 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[09-2001 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: non-negative off diagonal capacitive matrix elements ??
- From: "Zabinski, Patrick J." <zabinski.patrick@xxxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 19:21:29 -0500
Signal Guy,
The answer is "depends".
If you have a series of microstrip traces all edge
coupled, and the left-most microstrip is identfied
as Signal-1, the next one Signal-2, etc., then the
coupling should be as you indicate.
However, when we first generated some home-brewed EM
software, we made a slight mistake in not assigning
the signal numbers (i.e., matrix locations) in a logical
order. In other words, we could have the left-most microstrip
being Signal-2, the next one Signal-3, the next one
Signal-1, then Signal-8, etc... In this fashion, all
bets are off.
If you're getting a non-descending coupling coefficient
as you progress down the matrix, I suggest to double-/
triple-check the order in which your EM tool is
assigning the associated matrix order.
Pat
> Hi Folks,
> I have a question. Should the coupling coefficients in the
> maxwell capacitence matrix always be in the descending order
> going down along a column or can the coupling between the 2nd
> and 3rd element be greater than between the 1st and 2nd element.
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Signal Guy.
> --
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|