
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[07-2004 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[07-2004 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: Is Impedance Enough for Describing the PDS?
- From: Zhangkun <zhang_kun@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: weirsp@xxxxxxxxxx, si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:06:36 +0800
Dear steve
When you put all the decoupling capacitor into one corner of the board or
distribute them, the impedance of PDS is not same. If I only consider power
integrity, is impedance of PDS enough?
Best Regards
Zhangkun
2004.7.9
----- Original Message -----
From: "steve weir" <weirsp@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <zhang_kun@xxxxxxxxxx>; <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 8:33 AM
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Is Impedance Enough for Describing the PDS?
> Zhangkun, the problem is that the PDS overlaps both signal integrity and
> EMC compliance. If the system rules are done right, then the PDS
> decoupling problem will eventually reduce to an impedance profile. But
> that profile is both spatial and frequency dependent. If I shove all the
> decoupling capacitors into one corner of the board I get a very different
> result than if I distribute them.
>
> Steve.
> At 08:04 AM 7/9/2004 +0800, zhangkun 29902 wrote:
> >Dear all
> >
> >When talking about power delivery system with other engineer, there are a
> >lot of element to describe the PDS, such as energy storage, decoupling,
> >bypassing, and so on. I think all these parameter could be described by
> >one element, impedance of PDS.
> >
> >Is my point right? Is impedance enough for describing the PDS?
> >
> >Best Regards
> >
> >Zhangkun
> >2004.7.9
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >
> >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> >For help:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> >List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> >
> >List technical documents are available at:
> > http://www.si-list.org
> >
> >List archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >or at our remote archives:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|