
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[07-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[07-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: Fwd: vgs stress in digital cmos process
- From: Christopher Jakubiec <Christopher.Jakubiec@xxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Hi,
High voltage on either the gate (Vgs) or the drain (Vds) can cause reliabil=
ity=20
problems in the 0.18um CMOS process. There are two seperate physical issue=
s=20
taking place here though. Raising the voltage on the gate (Vgs) increases =
the=20
electric field across the gate-oxide-channel/bulk. So, the stress in this =
case=20
is on the gate oxide layer, and the extent of the stress depends on the oxi=
de=20
thickness. Thinner oxides will be experience more stress for a given gate=
=20
voltage. An over-stressed oxide can rupture, cause significant leakage, an=
d=20
ultimatley lose gate control. On the drain node, raising the voltage (Vds)=
can=20
generate high electric fields near the drain. The effect of high electric=
=20
fields near the drain is hot carrier injection into either or both the gate=
=20
oxide and the substrate. This can cause significant substrate current, and=
can=20
also effect the threshold voltage of the transistor. If the channel length=
is=20
short, this can also open up a series of short channel effects. Generally=
=20
people are more interested in how high they can drive the drain voltage to=
=20
obtain maximum speed/drive current, and thus reliablilty concerns are focus=
ed=20
there. Be aware if you are using thin gate oxides with higher than nominal=
=20
voltages on the gate, this can be problematic as well.
Chris Jakubiec
Product Engineer
Sun Microsystems
>=20
> HI, experts:
> =20
> I want to know that in 0.18um Digital CMOS process, major stress concern =
is=20
Vgs or Vds?
> =20
> i.e., if 1.8v NMOS's Vgs is higher than 1.8v, such as 1.9 or 2.2, will th=
at=20
cause reliability problem?
> =20
> According to one paper, only Vds higher than 1.8v will cause reliability=
=20
issue. The margin for Vgs will be much higher.
> =20
> Can any people familiar with silicon explain it for me? TSMC data may be =
used=20
for reference.
> =20
> Thanks!
> =20
> BH
> (If you have received , please ignore, thanks)
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> =B9=FA=C4=DA=B5=E7=D3=CA=D3=C3=BB=A7=B7=B4=C0=AC=BB=F8=B5=F7=B2=E9=C0=AD=
=BF=AA=E1=A1=C4=BB
>=20
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>=20
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>=20
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>=20
> List archives are viewable at: =20
> =09=09http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> =09=09http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> =09=09http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> =20
>=20
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|