
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[05-2006 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[05-2006 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: Impedance control with split ground planes
- From: "Jack C. Olson" <OLSON_JACK_C@xxxxxxx>
- To: weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:08:07 -0500
Forgive me for asking such a "newbie" question among so many
experts, but just reading through this thread has made me curious...
(I have never had to use blind vias before, but I have some experience
with impedance control.)
If the original problem was that routing out from the BGA has to be
done on layer 2 from blind vias, where did he go wrong?
Do other designs drill through a plane on 2 and route from 3?
None of the responses ever said what the original mistake was in
designing the stackup, so I am confused.
Jack (aka "the new guy")
steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
04/20/2006 08:28 AM
Please respond to
weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx
To
To
Balaji.S@xxxxxxxxxxxx
si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[SI-LIST] Re: Impedance control with split ground planes
Caterpillar: Confidential Green Retain Until: 05/20/2006 Retention
Category: G90 - General Matters/Administration
Balaji, I don't think there are any simple fixes. About the only
think you have going for you is that SDR 133 is pretty tolerant. My
best recommendation is to start with the basics: Propose a strategy
and test feasibility. If it is feasible then work the details. If
not, iterate using a different strategy. I know no other reliable
way to design. From your questions, it sounds like you may have
elected an implementation before determining overall feasibility. If
so, it is time to back-up and see where you stand. If you are lucky
then the strategy is feasible with some effort and/or changes.
Good luck.
Steve.
At 12:52 AM 4/20/2006, Balaji S wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>A small correction. My high speed signals are routed on S2 ( and not on
>S1. typo).. Still is the design so flawed??
>
>Since due to microvias (aspect ratio 1:1) and cost constraint, we had to
>go 4 that stack-up.
>
>Any suggestions for improvement will definitely be welcome..
>
>Regards
>Balaji S
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|