Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[si-list] || [Date Prev] [05-2003 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [05-2003 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[SI-LIST] Re: "checkered" copper plane question

  • From: Robert Haller <rhaller@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: michael.j.hill@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 15:43:37 -0400
Bill,
    A lot of good input here on this thread From Chris and Michael. 
After spending a few summers working in the DEC Board Shop, touring 
countless others and spending years eating at the same dinner table with 
a Manufacturing engineer and a Chemical engineer. I'll Weigh in on this 
too.

The most significant benefit, and initial motivation for so called 
"auto-thieving" is for even plating distribution. It is/was utilized to 
minimize copper plating variations over a panel in an electro-plate process.

In an electro-plate gold bath all of the fingers are bussed together 
then later the bus bar is excised off.

In the copper tank there are bus bars around the edge of the panel 
(Cathode) , and anodes are in the plating bath. The current passes from 
the cathode to the anode which electro-deposits copper (from the bath) 
onto everything that is not covered with resist. Since under the resist 
the entire circuit is still electrically shorted together.

If you have higher areas of copper the current density and ultimately 
the plating density will be larger.

The problem is exacerbated by larger panel sizes, finer etch widths and 
controlled impedance.

What you need to carefully inspect in the artwork is none of the 
post-processed 'manufacturing stuff' impacts the electrical behavior of 
your circuits.


regards,
Bob
-- 
Robert J. Haller (rhaller@xxxxxxxxxx)
Principal Consultant
Signal Integrity Software Inc.
6 Clock Tower Place, Suite 250
Maynard, MA 01754
Phone: (978) 461-0449, ext 15


Hill, Michael J wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have often wondered about this as well and have never heard a =
> definitive explanation (lots of people seem to do it because everyone =
> else does).  I had always assumed it had the following benefits:
> 
> 1) it reduces the amount of copper to be removed and thus decreases etch =
> chemical usage
> 2) it evens out the etch across the board so that the etch chemicals =
> don't get depleted in locations that would otherwise require a lot of =
> etching.  This would even out the etch time across the board so that =
> small features are not over etched while waiting for the large areas to =
> be removed.
> 3) it would provide more even thermal expansion effects between the top =
> and bottom layers of the board - and reduce board bending with =
> temperature because the top and bottom copper expansions would be more =
> similar (than the case with lots of copper on one side and large copper =
> voids on the other).
> 4) This one is a stretch (although I have actually used them this way)- =
> it makes reworking a prototype board easier because you have dummy nodes =
> you can solder parts & wires to.=20
> 
> I am a little confused about the "copper thieving" plating explanation =
> as all the board processing I have been involved with required doing the =
> via and plane copper plating before etch (typically this is =
> electroplating, so if etch is done first, then it is not always possible =
> to connect electrically to all of the surfaces to be plated).  Maybe =
> Chris intended etch, not plating, or maybe I'm unaware of new processing =
> methods (it has been 3 or 4 years..).
> 
> As for the EM effects - these squares would have to be very carefully =
> designed to have a reliable and predictable effect from an EM =
> perspective, so unless they were talking it up as a special design and =
> knew what they were talking about, I would doubt any EM explanation.
> 
> Mike
> 
> -----------------------
> Michael Hill Ph.D.
> Sr. Packaging Engineer
> Intel Corporation
> MS CH5-157
> 5000 W. Chandler Blvd
> Chandler Arizona, 85226
> 
> ph: 480-552-6013
> fax: 480-552-1295
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: christopher.heard@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:christopher.heard@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 10:37 AM
> To: williamm@xxxxxxx
> Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: "checkered" copper plane question
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Bill,
> 
> This is called "copper thieving".  The concept is that the presence of =
> the
> small squares will distribute the plating across the area of the pcb.
> Theiving is generally used when there are areas on a pcb surface that =
> have
> densely packed plated features mixed with very little plated features.
> 
> Connectors that have many holes in a small area on a pcb may have =
> theiving
> squares added around the connector pattern to control the amount of =
> plating
> in the holes.
> 
> Chris
> 
> **********************
> Chris Heard
> Teradyne
> Work: 603-879-1031
> Cell: 508-277-5780
> SMS Text Message: 5082775780@xxxxxxxxx
> Email: christopher.heard@xxxxxxxxxxxx





------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  





[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.