
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[04-2004 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[04-2004 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: Paralleling driver outputs - is this still done?
- From: "Brown, Mike (Austin, TX)" <mibrown@xxxxxx>
- To: <Charles.Grasso@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 13:31:50 -0600
The old rationale for justifying this (drivers in the same package only) =
was "identical" PVT conditions and simultaneous (or nearly so) drive. =
That would still hold, I think. I haven't used it in years, mostly =
because I've had some control over the drive strength of the output =
circuits. =20
The conditions which allow the short to happen are not obviously =
different than the condition which permits "crowbar" current to flow =
from VDD to VSS when there is only one driver involved (assuming =
simultaneous drive). The impedance of the package and board will serve =
to limit the magnitude of the current - for a few hundred ps, at least.
Your board test people are going to scream, unless you make provisions =
to enable one driver at a time for board test.
A maybe better way to drive multiple loads (assuming clocks or =
point-to-point topology) is a radial distribution of series terminated =
lines. The Moto ap notes for their clock distribution PLLs covers this =
in pretty good detail. That way, you don't have to tie the outputs =
together physically.
Let us know what you decide, and why, please.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Grasso, Charles
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:38 PM
To: 'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [SI-LIST] Paralleling driver outputs - is this still done?
Greetings:
=20
I have a design that will (I believe) need to used a buffer for the =
clock.
The intent is to drive multiple loads from the driver. One concern is =
the
variable gate delays and the solution is to parallel the inputs and the
outputs.
=20
Is this technique still used ? Does anyone have a feel for the long term
reliability of the device driven is such a way. The concern is that =
there
will be (for really short periods) a short between VCc and Gnd.
=20
Thanks..
=20
Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Senior Compliance Engineer
Echostar Communications Corp.
Tel: 303-706-5467
Fax: 303-799-6222
Cell: 303-204-2974
Email: charles.grasso@xxxxxxxxxxxx; <mailto:charles.grasso@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
%20> =20
Email Alternate: chasgrasso@xxxxxxxx <mailto:chasgrasso@xxxxxxxx>=20
=20
=20
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at: =20
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
=20
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|