
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[03-2004 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[03-2004 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: uStrip question - repost
- From: "Grasso, Charles" <Charles.Grasso@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: 'Bill Dempsey ' <bdempsey85@xxxxxxxxxxx>,"'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx '" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:28:23 -0700
As I have learned the hard way - make sure you model
what you measure and measure what you model. Make accurate
crossections of your test boards, check the board material
- the charactersitics FR4 can vary wildly - did you sim with
the solder mask - do the the freebies use closed form eqns or
EM simulation? Do the freebies account for resistive losses
at high freq? Some qs that spring to mind...
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Dempsey
To: bdempsey85@xxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 3/8/2004 8:57 PM
Subject: [SI-LIST] uStrip question - repost
--sorry for the repost but the server is adding junk to the message that
made it unclear to read --
I recently built 3 different uStrip construction testboards and was
surprised by the results: it didn't work!
I built two boards as trace over copper with soldermask and one board
as a co-planar waveguide. I constructed the geometries of the boards by
following the results of some "freebie" tools out there.
After the boards were built I connected them to an HP network analyzer
(I calibrated out the cables/cons) to look at S21 response. What I
found was surprising. The S21 was extremely poor: approx 6.5dB loss
over 4". This just does not compare to the results of the tools I have
access to. I expected about 1.2 - 1.5 dB of loss at this frequency.
Has anyone else out there had some bad experiences with uStrip @
2.5GHz? What tools are you using? How are you correlating your
tool's results to real-world?
The construction of the three boards was as follows:
Board 1: 12 mil trace, 1/2 oz foil with 1 oz plating, 8 mil to gnd
(three
sheets of 1080 prepreg), 1oz copper gnd
Board 2: (CPW): 8 mil trace, 8 mils to gnd (again, 3 sheets of 1080
prepreg), 6 mil to gnd return on signal layer, same plating/thicknesses
Board 3: 4.75 mil trace, ~2.83 mils to gnd (one sheet of 1080 prepreg),
1/2 oz foil, 1oz plating, 1oz copper gnd
Regards,
Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|