
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[03-2004 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[03-2004 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: EMC Issue at 266 MHz
- From: "Charles Grasso" <cgrassosprint1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <npischl@xxxxxxxxx>, <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:16:46 -0800
phooey - its a power cord problem - If you yank the
power cord I'll bet the emissions vanish! :-D
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of npischl
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 9:59 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: EMC Issue at 266 MHz
Using a probe to sniff out the board will not probably lead to
anywhere, because 266MHz will most likely be seen at every clock
component/device.
A quick way to figure out if and which segment of the clock
distributin is a problem is to systematically shut down different
clock devices and traces (usually, the device doesn't have to be
operational for clock-related emission to exist). It can be done by
e.g. removing series termiation resistors, lifting clock output or
input pipns, removing ferrite beads and/or lifting power pins,
citting traces.
Monitor emission while doing it (depending on the radiation
mechanism, you may use a bendh-method, e.g. current clamp, or you
may have to use the EMI chamber).
If you are lucky, shutting down only one clock will have most
significant impact, in which case you may be able deduce what is the
noisiest part of the clock distribution. That may lead to a simple
solution. If it turns out that all or many of the clocks are
contributing equally, then you'll have to figure out something else.
That would be, either a significant circuit change, or you may be
able to block emission by tackling the radiation mechanism rather
than the source.
Good luck, Neven
--- In si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Ken Cantrell" <Ken.Cantrell@xxxx>
wrote:
> Jean-Pierre,
> I think Brent DeWitt's approach is the first step, try and find
out where
> it's coming from. If this proves unproductive, don't forget about
enclosure
> and/or cable length resonances.
> Ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: si-list-bounce@xxxx
> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxx]On Behalf Of Ingraham, Andrew
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:53 PM
> To: si-list@xxxx
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: EMC Issue at 266 MHz
>
>
> Even if the clock waveforms were perfectly symmetrical ...
>
> If on-chip circuits are clocked by both rising and falling edges
of the
> input clock, then you've got a strong even harmonic. There could
be
> radiation from the on-chip circuits, or from the supply lines
to/from the
> chip.
>
> Also, keep in mind that there could be small amounts of
intermodulation
> between the various frequencies present, which include not only 50
and 66.7
> MHz, but also 16.7 MHz or something lower at the PLL's phase
detector. This
> lower frequency may not appear on any of the PLL's pins, but it
could be
> causing a weak modulation of the VCO output.
>
> Regards,
> Andy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|