
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[02-2008 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[02-2008 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: TDR vs. VNA? Which to purchase?
- From: David Instone <dave.instone@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Peterson, James F (EHCOE)" <james.f.peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:53:53 +0000
They do but if you just want S params and don't want to create models
you just need the 80SSPAR package which is 4500 British pounds,
probably cheaper elsewhere
Regards
Dave Instone
+44 (0)1235 824963
Peterson, James F (EHCOE) wrote:
> Last time I checked, Tek charged extra for the TDR's Iconnect
> SW...they're pretty proud of that software, if you know what I mean.=20
>
> -Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Lars Juul
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 10:22 AM
> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: TDR vs. VNA? Which to purchase?
>
> Hi Tom.
> For characterization and validation of new board designs, I'd personally
> go
> for the TDR, as the hunt for discontinuities and other impedance
> mismatches
> on a board is far more easy in the time domain. I believe some models
> also
> show the excess capacitance/inductance.
>
> But again, there are exceptions, depending on the interface you want to
> characterize. Take the XFP interface for instance. It has some of the
> electrical interconnect parameters defined in terms of DS11, DS21. If
> you
> want to demonstrate compliance you really do need a VNA to measure it.
>
> For video applications, I'm not sure what the requirements are, but I
> doubt
> a VNA is the answer to your questions, unless RF is involved.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Lars
>
> 2008/2/19, Tom Cipollone <tom_cip_11551@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I realize that this thread has been done before, but as we all know,
>> technology changes pretty fast, and what might have been true a year
>>
> or two
>
>> ago, may not still be true today.
>>
>> I am ready to make a large investment in signal integrity test
>>
> equipment
>
>> for my company. I'm probably no more than a week away from the
>>
> decision. As
>
>> some of you will no doubt suggest to get both, let me just say that I
>>
> can
>
>> not afford both. I will have one or the other.
>>
>> I have had the demos and seen the equipment.
>>
>> What I do for a living is design boards for digital video, that are
>> comprised of many differential pairs, routed closely together. Rising
>>
> edges
>
>> are in the neighborhood of 100 ps. I want to be able to find and
>>
> modify
>
>> discontinuities (either capacitive or inductive), determine crosstalk
>> between the pairs and measusre jitter (yes, I will need a signal
>>
> source for
>
>> that).
>>
>> If this were as little as two years ago I would have believed that
>>
> the
>
>> VNA solution would have been the most versatile. However, Tektronix
>>
> has made
>
>> a lot of progress with their TDR equipment and with their "Iconnect"
>> software. Also, there is a big difference in price between the TDR
>>
> solution
>
>> and the VNA solution.
>>
>> In appealing to the SI group for opinions I am trying to go beyond
>>
> my
>
>> own predjudice and the marketing hype.
>>
>> Thank You
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from si-list:
>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>>
>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>>
>> For help:
>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>>
>>
>> List technical documents are available at:
>> http://www.si-list.net
>>
>> List archives are viewable at:
>> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>> or at our remote archives:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at: =20
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> =20
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|