
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[02-2005 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[02-2005 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] Re: Input Clock phase noise and TX eye closurein SERDES
- From: john <johndp@xxxxxxxx>
- To: a.ingraham@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 22:21:11 +0000
Andy,
I guess this is because the functions usually used to describe the phase
noise are of the type 1/F^n, which
obviously tend to infinity as f tends to 0. However there is a 1998
paper that has an alternative theory on
phase noise :-
Phase noise and timing jitter in oscillators,Demir, A.
<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/quicksrchresult.jsp?queryText=%28demir%20a.%3Cin%3Eau%29&valnm=Demir%2C+A.&ResultCount=15&SortField=Score&SortOrder=desc&reqloc=au>
Mehrotra, A.
<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/quicksrchresult.jsp?queryText=%28mehrotra%20a.%3Cin%3Eau%29&valnm=Mehrotra%2C+A.&ResultCount=15&SortField=Score&SortOrder=desc&reqloc=au>
Roychowdhury, J.
<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/quicksrchresult.jsp?queryText=%28roychowdhury%20j.%3Cin%3Eau%29&valnm=Roychowdhury%2C+J.&ResultCount=15&SortField=Score&SortOrder=desc&reqloc=au>
AT&T Bell Labs. Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1998.,
Proceedings of the IEEE 1998
My query is why the lower limit is set at say 10KHz as in say OC192, I
guess I need to do the math suggested by Craig
for some insight .
Regards
John
Andrew Ingraham wrote:
>John,
>
>I don't know if this helps, and I'm not entirely certain that it's correct ...
>
>... but several years ago I remember reading in Gardner's PLL book that there
>are mathematical difficulties that aren't yet understood about low frequency
>phase noise. I think he said that, in theory, if you do the math, a PLL cannot
>possibly stay in-lock because when you integrate the effect of the low
>frequency
>noise on the PLL, the result is infinite (due to the increasing LF phase noise
>of the source). Yet PLLs do seem to work and stay in lock. He concluded that
>perhaps our understanding about noise spectra is incorrect, and more work is
>required.
>
>Regards,
>Andy
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
>List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
>List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.4 - Release Date: 01/02/2005
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|